PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CEMQ.DE vs. EUPE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CEMQ.DE vs. EUPE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI Europe Quality Factor UCITS ETF (CEMQ.DE) and Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE® Europe Sector Value TR UCITS ETF 1C (EUR) (EUPE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEMQ.DE achieves a 4.17% return, which is significantly lower than EUPE.DE's 15.44% return. Over the past 10 years, CEMQ.DE has underperformed EUPE.DE with an annualized return of 7.82%, while EUPE.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 8.97% annualized return.


CEMQ.DE

1D
0.82%
1M
-0.63%
YTD
4.17%
6M
5.95%
1Y
6.60%
3Y*
7.83%
5Y*
5.86%
10Y*
7.82%

EUPE.DE

1D
0.35%
1M
0.49%
YTD
15.44%
6M
15.81%
1Y
24.47%
3Y*
11.71%
5Y*
8.60%
10Y*
8.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEMQ.DE vs. EUPE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CEMQ.DE
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Quality Factor UCITS ETF
4.17%10.17%3.72%14.50%-11.87%26.64%1.09%32.48%-7.31%10.34%
EUPE.DE
Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE® Europe Sector Value TR UCITS ETF 1C (EUR)
15.44%12.45%2.14%12.84%-6.14%25.64%2.80%24.48%-7.47%5.56%

Correlation

The correlation between CEMQ.DE and EUPE.DE is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2015

0.88

The correlation between CEMQ.DE and EUPE.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CEMQ.DE vs. EUPE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEMQ.DE
CEMQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
CEMQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEMQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEMQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
CEMQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEMQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

EUPE.DE
EUPE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
EUPE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUPE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUPE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
EUPE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUPE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEMQ.DE vs. EUPE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Quality Factor UCITS ETF (CEMQ.DE) and Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE® Europe Sector Value TR UCITS ETF 1C (EUR) (EUPE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CEMQ.DEEUPE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.37

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

4.19

-3.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.14

11.50

-9.36

CEMQ.DE vs. EUPE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEMQ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the EUPE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEMQ.DE and EUPE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CEMQ.DEEUPE.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

2.17

-1.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.65

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.60

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.46

+0.01

Drawdowns

CEMQ.DE vs. EUPE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEMQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.74%, roughly equal to the maximum EUPE.DE drawdown of -32.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEMQ.DE and EUPE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CEMQ.DEEUPE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.74%

-32.64%

-1.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.40%

-5.82%

-2.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.90%

-15.63%

+0.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.69%

-15.63%

-4.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.74%

-32.64%

-1.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.60%

-3.04%

+0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.35%

-4.95%

-0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.17%

2.13%

+1.04%

Volatility

CEMQ.DE vs. EUPE.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI Europe Quality Factor UCITS ETF (CEMQ.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.97% compared to Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE® Europe Sector Value TR UCITS ETF 1C (EUR) (EUPE.DE) at 3.64%. This indicates that CEMQ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUPE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CEMQ.DEEUPE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.97%

3.64%

+0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.53%

8.56%

+0.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.93%

11.27%

+0.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.02%

13.17%

+0.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.02%

14.99%

+0.03%

CEMQ.DE vs. EUPE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEMQ.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than EUPE.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

CEMQ.DE vs. EUPE.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither CEMQ.DE nor EUPE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CEMQ.DE and EUPE.DE have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CEMQ.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CEMQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for EUPE.DE.

CEMQ.DE tracks MSCI Europe Sector Neutral Quality, while EUPE.DE tracks Shiller Barclays CAPE® Europe Sector Value. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Natixis. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CEMQ.DE and 0.65% for EUPE.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CEMQ.DE and EUPE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer