CEMQ.DE vs. 5HEU.DE
CEMQ.DE (iShares Edge MSCI Europe Quality Factor UCITS ETF) and 5HEU.DE (Ossiam ESG Shiller Barclays CAPE® Europe Sector UCITS ETF (EUR)) are both Europe Equities funds - CEMQ.DE tracks the MSCI Europe Sector Neutral Quality while 5HEU.DE tracks the Ossiam ESG Shiller Barclays CAPE® Europe Sector. Both are passively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CEMQ.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for 5HEU.DE.
Performance
CEMQ.DE vs. 5HEU.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CEMQ.DE
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- -0.63%
- YTD
- 4.17%
- 6M
- 5.95%
- 1Y
- 6.60%
- 3Y*
- 7.83%
- 5Y*
- 5.86%
- 10Y*
- 7.82%
5HEU.DE
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CEMQ.DE vs. 5HEU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEMQ.DE iShares Edge MSCI Europe Quality Factor UCITS ETF | 4.17% | 10.17% | 3.72% | 14.50% | -5.87% |
5HEU.DE Ossiam ESG Shiller Barclays CAPE® Europe Sector UCITS ETF (EUR) | 0.00% | 4.88% | -2.91% | 6.26% | -6.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEMQ.DE and 5HEU.DE is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2022 | 0.75 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CEMQ.DE and 5HEU.DE has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEMQ.DE vs. 5HEU.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CEMQ.DE
5HEU.DE
CEMQ.DE vs. 5HEU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Quality Factor UCITS ETF (CEMQ.DE) and Ossiam ESG Shiller Barclays CAPE® Europe Sector UCITS ETF (EUR) (5HEU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEMQ.DE | 5HEU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.80 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.14 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEMQ.DE | 5HEU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | — | — |
Drawdowns
CEMQ.DE vs. 5HEU.DE - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEMQ.DE | 5HEU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.90% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.60% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.35% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.17% | — | — |
Volatility
CEMQ.DE vs. 5HEU.DE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEMQ.DE | 5HEU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.97% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.53% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.93% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.02% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.02% | — | — |
CEMQ.DE vs. 5HEU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEMQ.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than 5HEU.DE's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CEMQ.DE vs. 5HEU.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CEMQ.DE nor 5HEU.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CEMQ.DE and 5HEU.DE have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CEMQ.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CEMQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 5HEU.DE.
CEMQ.DE tracks MSCI Europe Sector Neutral Quality, while 5HEU.DE tracks Ossiam ESG Shiller Barclays CAPE® Europe Sector. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Natixis. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CEMQ.DE and 0.75% for 5HEU.DE.
Find the right allocation for CEMQ.DE and 5HEU.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer