CEMIX vs. FCEEX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

CEMIX (Causeway Emerging Markets Fund) and FCEEX (Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past 5 years, CEMIX returned 10.75%/yr vs 9.34%/yr for FCEEX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CEMIX charges 1.10%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for FCEEX.

Performance

CEMIX vs. FCEEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Causeway Emerging Markets Fund (CEMIX) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCEEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEMIX achieves a 28.79% return, which is significantly higher than FCEEX's 23.70% return.

CEMIX

• 1D: -6.06%
• 1M: 1.64%
• YTD: 28.79%
• 6M: 30.32%
• 1Y: 51.73%
• 3Y*: 29.49%
• 5Y*: 10.75%
• 10Y*: 11.88%

FCEEX

• 1D: -5.20%
• 1M: 1.63%
• YTD: 23.70%
• 6M: 24.74%
• 1Y: 43.40%
• 3Y*: 25.24%
• 5Y*: 9.34%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEMIX vs. FCEEX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
CEMIX Causeway Emerging Markets Fund	28.79%	36.22%	14.90%	17.13%	-23.05%	-0.83%	16.95%	11.54%
FCEEX Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor	23.70%	34.81%	10.51%	12.52%	-16.96%	-1.29%	10.19%	9.77%

Correlation

The correlation between CEMIX and FCEEX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019	0.92

The correlation between CEMIX and FCEEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CEMIX vs. FCEEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEMIX

CEMIX Risk / Return Rank: 81
CEMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
CEMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
CEMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 80
CEMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
CEMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

FCEEX

FCEEX Risk / Return Rank: 75
FCEEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
FCEEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
FCEEX Omega Ratio Rank: 75
FCEEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
FCEEX Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEMIX vs. FCEEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Causeway Emerging Markets Fund (CEMIX) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCEEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CEMIX	FCEEX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.42	2.31	+0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.89	2.87	+0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.44	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.20	3.66	+0.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.79	13.77	+2.02

CEMIX vs. FCEEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEMIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the FCEEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEMIX and FCEEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CEMIX vs. FCEEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEMIX drawdown since its inception was -68.90%, which is greater than FCEEX's maximum drawdown of -34.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEMIX and FCEEX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CEMIX	FCEEX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.90%	-34.68%	-34.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.61%	-12.98%	-0.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.92%	-15.47%	-2.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.29%	-33.39%	-2.90%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.59%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.06%	-5.42%	-0.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.75%	-11.19%	-4.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.60%	3.44%	+0.16%

Volatility

CEMIX vs. FCEEX - Volatility Comparison

Causeway Emerging Markets Fund (CEMIX) has a higher volatility of 14.04% compared to Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCEEX) at 11.80%. This indicates that CEMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCEEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CEMIX	FCEEX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.04%	11.80%	+2.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.31%	18.41%	+2.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.60%	20.60%	+3.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.56%	17.57%	+0.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.73%	18.74%	-0.01%

CEMIX vs. FCEEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEMIX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than FCEEX's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

CEMIX vs. FCEEX - Dividend Comparison

CEMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, less than FCEEX's 2.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CEMIX Causeway Emerging Markets Fund	1.94%	2.49%	3.73%	4.85%	4.87%	23.35%	1.36%	2.03%	2.01%	1.58%	1.55%	1.69%
FCEEX Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor	2.38%	3.29%	4.17%	4.36%	4.08%	3.38%	2.98%	0.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CEMIX and FCEEX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, CEMIX and FCEEX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, CEMIX or FCEEX?

CEMIX has higher volatility (14.04%) compared to FCEEX (11.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CEMIX dropped -68.90% vs FCEEX's -34.68%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CEMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.