PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CEMIX vs. ARSVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CEMIX vs. ARSVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Causeway Emerging Markets Fund (CEMIX) and AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund (ARSVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEMIX achieves a 36.68% return, which is significantly higher than ARSVX's -0.70% return. Over the past 10 years, CEMIX has outperformed ARSVX with an annualized return of 12.36%, while ARSVX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.84% annualized return.


CEMIX

1D
0.97%
1M
10.77%
YTD
36.68%
6M
41.26%
1Y
71.52%
3Y*
32.96%
5Y*
11.94%
10Y*
12.36%

ARSVX

1D
0.07%
1M
-0.77%
YTD
-0.70%
6M
-10.33%
1Y
-5.57%
3Y*
5.66%
5Y*
3.00%
10Y*
8.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEMIX vs. ARSVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CEMIX
Causeway Emerging Markets Fund
36.68%36.22%14.90%17.13%-23.05%-0.83%16.95%16.73%-17.91%39.79%
ARSVX
AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund
-0.70%-7.36%14.05%14.86%-6.49%21.14%1.84%38.29%-6.96%11.73%

Correlation

The correlation between CEMIX and ARSVX is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2007

0.56

Over the past year, the correlation between CEMIX and ARSVX has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CEMIX vs. ARSVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEMIX
CEMIX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CEMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
CEMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

ARSVX
ARSVX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
ARSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
ARSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEMIX vs. ARSVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Causeway Emerging Markets Fund (CEMIX) and AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund (ARSVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CEMIXARSVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

0.97

+0.69

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.31

-0.27

+5.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.17

-0.56

+21.72

CEMIX vs. ARSVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEMIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.61, which is higher than the ARSVX Sharpe Ratio of -0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEMIX and ARSVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CEMIXARSVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.61

-0.27

+3.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.17

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

0.46

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.40

-0.06

Drawdowns

CEMIX vs. ARSVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEMIX drawdown since its inception was -68.90%, which is greater than ARSVX's maximum drawdown of -54.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEMIX and ARSVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CEMIXARSVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.90%

-54.85%

-14.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.61%

-16.62%

+3.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.92%

-19.21%

+1.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.56%

-19.21%

-17.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.59%

-40.52%

+0.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-13.56%

+13.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.79%

-8.68%

-7.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.40%

8.08%

-4.68%

Volatility

CEMIX vs. ARSVX - Volatility Comparison

Causeway Emerging Markets Fund (CEMIX) has a higher volatility of 8.26% compared to AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund (ARSVX) at 3.58%. This indicates that CEMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARSVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CEMIXARSVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.26%

3.58%

+4.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.06%

13.76%

+3.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.04%

17.10%

+2.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.69%

17.86%

-0.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.40%

19.35%

-0.95%

CEMIX vs. ARSVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEMIX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is lower than ARSVX's 1.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

CEMIX vs. ARSVX - Dividend Comparison

CEMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, while ARSVX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARSVX
AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund
0.00%0.00%8.50%4.78%3.87%7.75%0.00%12.10%13.01%14.96%4.96%6.51%
CEMIX
Causeway Emerging Markets Fund
1.83%2.49%3.73%4.85%4.87%23.35%1.36%2.03%2.01%1.58%1.55%1.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


CEMIX and ARSVX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CEMIX has higher volatility (8.26%) compared to ARSVX (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CEMIX dropped -68.90% vs ARSVX's -54.85%.

CEMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.61 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CEMIX and ARSVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer