CEMG.DE vs. WELM.DE
CEMG.DE (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and WELM.DE (Amundi S&P Global Consumer Staples ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - CEMG.DE tracks the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR while WELM.DE tracks the S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap Sustainability Enhanced Consumer Staples. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CEMG.DE returned 3.00%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for WELM.DE. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CEMG.DE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for WELM.DE.
Performance
CEMG.DE vs. WELM.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEMG.DE achieves a -7.03% return, which is significantly lower than WELM.DE's 2.90% return.
CEMG.DE
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -1.58%
- YTD
- -7.03%
- 6M
- -8.66%
- 1Y
- -8.22%
- 3Y*
- 3.00%
- 5Y*
- -2.27%
- 10Y*
- 3.56%
WELM.DE
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -2.95%
- YTD
- 2.90%
- 6M
- 1.47%
- 1Y
- -1.94%
- 3Y*
- 0.41%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CEMG.DE vs. WELM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEMG.DE iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -7.03% | 0.86% | 16.93% | 1.69% | 3.37% |
WELM.DE Amundi S&P Global Consumer Staples ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist | 2.90% | -6.92% | 9.50% | -2.21% | 2.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEMG.DE and WELM.DE is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2022 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEMG.DE vs. WELM.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CEMG.DE
WELM.DE
CEMG.DE vs. WELM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CEMG.DE) and Amundi S&P Global Consumer Staples ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist (WELM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEMG.DE | WELM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 0.97 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | -0.37 | -0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.23 | -0.70 | -0.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEMG.DE | WELM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.64 | -0.27 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.13 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
CEMG.DE vs. WELM.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEMG.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, which is greater than WELM.DE's maximum drawdown of -13.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEMG.DE and WELM.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEMG.DE | WELM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.94% | -13.66% | -20.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.05% | -9.30% | -4.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.18% | -13.66% | -6.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.08% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.75% | -8.92% | -9.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.26% | -5.59% | -6.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.68% | 5.63% | +1.05% |
Volatility
CEMG.DE vs. WELM.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CEMG.DE) is 4.37%, while Amundi S&P Global Consumer Staples ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist (WELM.DE) has a volatility of 5.09%. This indicates that CEMG.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WELM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEMG.DE | WELM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.37% | 5.09% | -0.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.24% | 10.23% | +0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.88% | 12.75% | +0.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.54% | 12.50% | +6.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.33% | 12.50% | +5.83% |
CEMG.DE vs. WELM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEMG.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than WELM.DE's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
CEMG.DE vs. WELM.DE - Dividend Comparison
CEMG.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WELM.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CEMG.DE iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WELM.DE Amundi S&P Global Consumer Staples ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist | 2.27% | 2.18% | 2.02% | 2.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CEMG.DE and WELM.DE have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WELM.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WELM.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CEMG.DE.
CEMG.DE tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while WELM.DE tracks S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap Sustainability Enhanced Consumer Staples. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for CEMG.DE and 0.18% for WELM.DE.
Find the right allocation for CEMG.DE and WELM.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer