CEMG.DE vs. SC0R.DE
CEMG.DE (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and SC0R.DE (Invesco European Travel Sector UCITS ETF) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - CEMG.DE tracks the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR while SC0R.DE tracks the STOXX® Europe 600 Optimised Travel & Leisure. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CEMG.DE returned 3.56%/yr vs 3.85%/yr for SC0R.DE. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CEMG.DE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SC0R.DE.
Performance
CEMG.DE vs. SC0R.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEMG.DE achieves a -7.03% return, which is significantly lower than SC0R.DE's 0.24% return. Over the past 10 years, CEMG.DE has underperformed SC0R.DE with an annualized return of 3.56%, while SC0R.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 3.85% annualized return.
CEMG.DE
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -0.30%
- YTD
- -7.03%
- 6M
- -7.84%
- 1Y
- -8.22%
- 3Y*
- 3.00%
- 5Y*
- -2.27%
- 10Y*
- 3.56%
SC0R.DE
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 11.79%
- YTD
- 0.24%
- 6M
- 5.38%
- 1Y
- 8.65%
- 3Y*
- 6.07%
- 5Y*
- 2.45%
- 10Y*
- 3.85%
CEMG.DE vs. SC0R.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEMG.DE iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -7.03% | 0.86% | 16.93% | 1.69% | -16.08% | -1.07% | 11.30% | 25.51% | -16.68% | 23.33% |
SC0R.DE Invesco European Travel Sector UCITS ETF | 0.24% | 6.02% | 14.47% | 24.44% | -14.51% | 6.20% | -13.70% | 23.30% | -14.12% | 19.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEMG.DE and SC0R.DE is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2014 | 0.54 |
The correlation between CEMG.DE and SC0R.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEMG.DE vs. SC0R.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CEMG.DE
SC0R.DE
CEMG.DE vs. SC0R.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CEMG.DE) and Invesco European Travel Sector UCITS ETF (SC0R.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEMG.DE | SC0R.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.09 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | 0.61 | -1.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.23 | 1.44 | -2.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEMG.DE | SC0R.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.64 | 0.39 | -1.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.12 | 0.10 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 | 0.15 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.39 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
CEMG.DE vs. SC0R.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEMG.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, smaller than the maximum SC0R.DE drawdown of -55.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEMG.DE and SC0R.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEMG.DE | SC0R.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.94% | -55.64% | +21.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.05% | -14.20% | +0.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.18% | -24.76% | +4.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.08% | -38.34% | +7.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.94% | -55.64% | +21.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.75% | -1.42% | -17.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.26% | -10.37% | -1.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.68% | 5.99% | +0.69% |
Volatility
CEMG.DE vs. SC0R.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CEMG.DE) is 4.37%, while Invesco European Travel Sector UCITS ETF (SC0R.DE) has a volatility of 5.86%. This indicates that CEMG.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SC0R.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEMG.DE | SC0R.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.37% | 5.86% | -1.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.24% | 17.72% | -7.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.88% | 21.97% | -9.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.54% | 23.86% | -5.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.33% | 24.89% | -6.56% |
CEMG.DE vs. SC0R.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEMG.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SC0R.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
CEMG.DE vs. SC0R.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CEMG.DE nor SC0R.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CEMG.DE and SC0R.DE have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SC0R.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SC0R.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CEMG.DE.
CEMG.DE tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while SC0R.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Optimised Travel & Leisure. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for CEMG.DE and 0.20% for SC0R.DE.
Find the right allocation for CEMG.DE and SC0R.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer