CEMG.DE vs. QDVK.DE
CEMG.DE (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and QDVK.DE (iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds from iShares - CEMG.DE tracks the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR while QDVK.DE tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Discretionary. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CEMG.DE returned 3.56%/yr vs 12.66%/yr for QDVK.DE. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CEMG.DE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QDVK.DE.
Performance
CEMG.DE vs. QDVK.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEMG.DE achieves a -7.03% return, which is significantly lower than QDVK.DE's -0.11% return. Over the past 10 years, CEMG.DE has underperformed QDVK.DE with an annualized return of 3.56%, while QDVK.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 12.66% annualized return.
CEMG.DE
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -0.30%
- YTD
- -7.03%
- 6M
- -7.84%
- 1Y
- -8.22%
- 3Y*
- 3.00%
- 5Y*
- -2.27%
- 10Y*
- 3.56%
QDVK.DE
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -0.70%
- YTD
- -0.11%
- 6M
- 0.74%
- 1Y
- 9.98%
- 3Y*
- 13.82%
- 5Y*
- 9.12%
- 10Y*
- 12.66%
CEMG.DE vs. QDVK.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEMG.DE iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -7.03% | 0.86% | 16.93% | 1.69% | -16.08% | -1.07% | 11.30% | 25.51% | -16.68% | 23.33% |
QDVK.DE iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) | -0.11% | -5.11% | 38.60% | 38.90% | -33.82% | 35.49% | 20.84% | 31.88% | 3.58% | 7.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEMG.DE and QDVK.DE is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2015 | 0.64 |
The correlation between CEMG.DE and QDVK.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEMG.DE vs. QDVK.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CEMG.DE
QDVK.DE
CEMG.DE vs. QDVK.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CEMG.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVK.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEMG.DE | QDVK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.11 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | 0.73 | -1.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.23 | 2.00 | -3.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEMG.DE | QDVK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.64 | 0.56 | -1.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.12 | 0.41 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 | 0.61 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.53 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
CEMG.DE vs. QDVK.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEMG.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, smaller than the maximum QDVK.DE drawdown of -37.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEMG.DE and QDVK.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEMG.DE | QDVK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.94% | -37.28% | +3.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.05% | -13.65% | -0.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.18% | -30.81% | +10.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.08% | -37.28% | +6.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.94% | -37.28% | +3.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.75% | -10.02% | -8.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.26% | -9.22% | -3.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.68% | 4.99% | +1.69% |
Volatility
CEMG.DE vs. QDVK.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CEMG.DE) is 4.37%, while iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVK.DE) has a volatility of 5.33%. This indicates that CEMG.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDVK.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEMG.DE | QDVK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.37% | 5.33% | -0.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.24% | 13.18% | -2.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.88% | 17.90% | -5.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.54% | 21.84% | -3.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.33% | 20.62% | -2.29% |
CEMG.DE vs. QDVK.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEMG.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVK.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
CEMG.DE vs. QDVK.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CEMG.DE nor QDVK.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CEMG.DE and QDVK.DE have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QDVK.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QDVK.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CEMG.DE.
CEMG.DE tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while QDVK.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Discretionary. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for CEMG.DE and 0.15% for QDVK.DE.
Find the right allocation for CEMG.DE and QDVK.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer