CEMG.DE vs. LFOD.DE
CEMG.DE (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and LFOD.DE (Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Food & Beverage UCITS ETF Acc) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - CEMG.DE tracks the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR while LFOD.DE tracks the STOXX® Europe 600 Food & Beverage. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CEMG.DE returned 3.56%/yr vs 2.55%/yr for LFOD.DE. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CEMG.DE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for LFOD.DE.
Performance
CEMG.DE vs. LFOD.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEMG.DE achieves a -7.03% return, which is significantly lower than LFOD.DE's -2.18% return. Over the past 10 years, CEMG.DE has outperformed LFOD.DE with an annualized return of 3.56%, while LFOD.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 2.55% annualized return.
CEMG.DE
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -0.30%
- YTD
- -7.03%
- 6M
- -7.84%
- 1Y
- -8.22%
- 3Y*
- 3.00%
- 5Y*
- -2.27%
- 10Y*
- 3.56%
LFOD.DE
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- -1.60%
- YTD
- -2.18%
- 6M
- -1.99%
- 1Y
- -5.63%
- 3Y*
- -2.00%
- 5Y*
- -1.16%
- 10Y*
- 2.55%
CEMG.DE vs. LFOD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEMG.DE iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -7.03% | 0.86% | 16.93% | 1.69% | -16.08% | -1.07% | 11.30% | 25.51% | -16.68% | 23.33% |
LFOD.DE Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Food & Beverage UCITS ETF Acc | -2.18% | 6.07% | -3.94% | -1.97% | -13.19% | 23.20% | -6.14% | 23.36% | -2.67% | 12.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEMG.DE and LFOD.DE is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2014 | 0.47 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CEMG.DE and LFOD.DE has dropped to 0.23 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEMG.DE vs. LFOD.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CEMG.DE
LFOD.DE
CEMG.DE vs. LFOD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CEMG.DE) and Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Food & Beverage UCITS ETF Acc (LFOD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEMG.DE | LFOD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 0.94 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | -0.47 | -0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.23 | -0.93 | -0.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEMG.DE | LFOD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.64 | -0.43 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.12 | -0.09 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 | 0.18 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.42 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
CEMG.DE vs. LFOD.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEMG.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, smaller than the maximum LFOD.DE drawdown of -41.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEMG.DE and LFOD.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEMG.DE | LFOD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.94% | -41.53% | +7.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.05% | -11.84% | -2.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.18% | -13.51% | -6.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.08% | -21.91% | -9.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.94% | -30.44% | -3.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.75% | -16.55% | -2.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.26% | -8.05% | -4.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.68% | 6.04% | +0.64% |
Volatility
CEMG.DE vs. LFOD.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CEMG.DE) and Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Food & Beverage UCITS ETF Acc (LFOD.DE) have volatilities of 4.37% and 4.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEMG.DE | LFOD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.37% | 4.46% | -0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.24% | 10.51% | -0.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.88% | 13.00% | -0.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.54% | 13.29% | +5.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.33% | 14.18% | +4.15% |
CEMG.DE vs. LFOD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEMG.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than LFOD.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
CEMG.DE vs. LFOD.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CEMG.DE nor LFOD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CEMG.DE and LFOD.DE have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LFOD.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LFOD.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CEMG.DE.
CEMG.DE tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while LFOD.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Food & Beverage. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for CEMG.DE and 0.30% for LFOD.DE.
Find the right allocation for CEMG.DE and LFOD.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer