CEMG.DE vs. EXH7.DE
CEMG.DE (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and EXH7.DE (iShares STOXX Europe 600 Personal & Household Goods UCITS ETF (DE)) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds from iShares - CEMG.DE tracks the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR while EXH7.DE tracks the STOXX® Europe 600 Personal & Household Goods. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CEMG.DE returned 3.56%/yr vs 4.39%/yr for EXH7.DE. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CEMG.DE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for EXH7.DE.
Performance
CEMG.DE vs. EXH7.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEMG.DE achieves a -7.03% return, which is significantly higher than EXH7.DE's -10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, CEMG.DE has underperformed EXH7.DE with an annualized return of 3.56%, while EXH7.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 4.39% annualized return.
CEMG.DE
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -1.58%
- YTD
- -7.03%
- 6M
- -8.66%
- 1Y
- -8.22%
- 3Y*
- 3.00%
- 5Y*
- -2.27%
- 10Y*
- 3.56%
EXH7.DE
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -1.12%
- YTD
- -10.91%
- 6M
- -10.75%
- 1Y
- -4.46%
- 3Y*
- -1.79%
- 5Y*
- -0.05%
- 10Y*
- 4.39%
CEMG.DE vs. EXH7.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEMG.DE iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -7.03% | 0.86% | 16.93% | 1.69% | -16.08% | -1.07% | 11.30% | 25.51% | -16.68% | 23.33% |
EXH7.DE iShares STOXX Europe 600 Personal & Household Goods UCITS ETF (DE) | -10.91% | 6.41% | 3.93% | 7.55% | -10.43% | 20.02% | 5.33% | 34.36% | -15.76% | 12.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEMG.DE and EXH7.DE is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2014 | 0.61 |
The correlation between CEMG.DE and EXH7.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEMG.DE vs. EXH7.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CEMG.DE
EXH7.DE
CEMG.DE vs. EXH7.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CEMG.DE) and iShares STOXX Europe 600 Personal & Household Goods UCITS ETF (DE) (EXH7.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEMG.DE | EXH7.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 0.96 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | -0.31 | -0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.23 | -0.72 | -0.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEMG.DE | EXH7.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.64 | -0.29 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.12 | -0.00 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 | 0.26 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.54 | -0.32 |
Drawdowns
CEMG.DE vs. EXH7.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEMG.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, smaller than the maximum EXH7.DE drawdown of -47.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEMG.DE and EXH7.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEMG.DE | EXH7.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.94% | -47.09% | +13.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.05% | -15.83% | +1.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.18% | -17.88% | -2.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.08% | -22.00% | -9.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.94% | -29.18% | -4.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.75% | -14.01% | -4.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.26% | -6.91% | -5.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.68% | 6.74% | -0.06% |
Volatility
CEMG.DE vs. EXH7.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CEMG.DE) is 4.37%, while iShares STOXX Europe 600 Personal & Household Goods UCITS ETF (DE) (EXH7.DE) has a volatility of 5.11%. This indicates that CEMG.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EXH7.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEMG.DE | EXH7.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.37% | 5.11% | -0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.24% | 13.48% | -3.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.88% | 16.63% | -3.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.54% | 17.40% | +1.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.33% | 16.95% | +1.38% |
CEMG.DE vs. EXH7.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEMG.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than EXH7.DE's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
CEMG.DE vs. EXH7.DE - Dividend Comparison
CEMG.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EXH7.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEMG.DE iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EXH7.DE iShares STOXX Europe 600 Personal & Household Goods UCITS ETF (DE) | 2.78% | 2.31% | 2.35% | 2.27% | 2.39% | 1.77% | 1.82% | 2.36% | 2.00% | 5.68% | 2.74% | 2.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CEMG.DE and EXH7.DE have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EXH7.DE is cheaper at 0.46% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EXH7.DE is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CEMG.DE.
CEMG.DE tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while EXH7.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Personal & Household Goods. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for CEMG.DE and 0.46% for EXH7.DE.
Find the right allocation for CEMG.DE and EXH7.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer