PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CEMG.DE vs. 3SUE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CEMG.DE vs. 3SUE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CEMG.DE) and iShares MSCI World Consumer Staples Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (3SUE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEMG.DE achieves a -7.03% return, which is significantly lower than 3SUE.DE's 0.62% return.


CEMG.DE

1D
-0.23%
1M
-0.30%
YTD
-7.03%
6M
-7.84%
1Y
-8.22%
3Y*
3.00%
5Y*
-2.27%
10Y*
3.56%

3SUE.DE

1D
-0.18%
1M
-2.28%
YTD
0.62%
6M
0.29%
1Y
-4.54%
3Y*
0.49%
5Y*
3.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEMG.DE vs. 3SUE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CEMG.DE
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
-7.03%0.86%16.93%1.69%-16.08%-1.07%11.30%7.94%
3SUE.DE
iShares MSCI World Consumer Staples Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist
0.62%-6.04%9.20%-0.30%0.12%22.84%-0.67%3.33%

Correlation

The correlation between CEMG.DE and 3SUE.DE is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2019

0.32

The correlation between CEMG.DE and 3SUE.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CEMG.DE vs. 3SUE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEMG.DE
CEMG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
CEMG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEMG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEMG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
CEMG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEMG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

3SUE.DE
3SUE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
3SUE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3SUE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
3SUE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
3SUE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
3SUE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEMG.DE vs. 3SUE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CEMG.DE) and iShares MSCI World Consumer Staples Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (3SUE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CEMG.DE3SUE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

0.95

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.58

-0.41

-0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.23

-0.91

-0.32

CEMG.DE vs. 3SUE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEMG.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.64, which is lower than the 3SUE.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEMG.DE and 3SUE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CEMG.DE3SUE.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.64

-0.38

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.12

0.29

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.31

-0.09

Drawdowns

CEMG.DE vs. 3SUE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEMG.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, which is greater than 3SUE.DE's maximum drawdown of -22.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEMG.DE and 3SUE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CEMG.DE3SUE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.94%

-22.98%

-10.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.05%

-10.93%

-3.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.18%

-13.04%

-7.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.08%

-13.04%

-18.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.75%

-10.63%

-8.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.26%

-5.61%

-6.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.68%

4.97%

+1.71%

Volatility

CEMG.DE vs. 3SUE.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CEMG.DE) is 4.37%, while iShares MSCI World Consumer Staples Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (3SUE.DE) has a volatility of 4.88%. This indicates that CEMG.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3SUE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CEMG.DE3SUE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.37%

4.88%

-0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.24%

9.87%

+0.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.88%

12.05%

+0.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.54%

11.43%

+7.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.33%

13.09%

+5.24%

CEMG.DE vs. 3SUE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEMG.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than 3SUE.DE's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

CEMG.DE vs. 3SUE.DE - Dividend Comparison

CEMG.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while 3SUE.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
3SUE.DE
iShares MSCI World Consumer Staples Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist
2.62%2.64%2.63%2.44%2.21%2.43%3.30%0.40%
CEMG.DE
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CEMG.DE and 3SUE.DE have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 3SUE.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

3SUE.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CEMG.DE.

CEMG.DE tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while 3SUE.DE tracks MSCI World Consumer Staples. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for CEMG.DE and 0.18% for 3SUE.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CEMG.DE and 3SUE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer