CEMFX vs. FPADX
Compare and contrast key facts about Cullen Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund (CEMFX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX).
CEMFX is managed by Cullen Funds Trust. It was launched on Aug 30, 2012. FPADX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 8, 2011.
Performance
CEMFX vs. FPADX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CEMFX vs. FPADX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEMFX Cullen Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund | 6.79% | 31.39% | 9.51% | 26.45% | -16.15% | 6.74% | 8.70% | 19.75% | -16.90% | 29.82% |
FPADX Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund | 0.22% | 33.90% | 6.80% | 9.51% | -20.06% | -3.07% | 17.84% | 18.28% | -14.65% | 35.16% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEMFX achieves a 6.79% return, which is significantly higher than FPADX's 0.22% return. Over the past 10 years, CEMFX has outperformed FPADX with an annualized return of 9.57%, while FPADX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.51% annualized return.
CEMFX
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- -11.79%
- YTD
- 6.79%
- 6M
- 11.80%
- 1Y
- 38.22%
- 3Y*
- 21.50%
- 5Y*
- 10.64%
- 10Y*
- 9.57%
FPADX
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- -12.34%
- YTD
- 0.22%
- 6M
- 4.75%
- 1Y
- 29.14%
- 3Y*
- 14.61%
- 5Y*
- 3.41%
- 10Y*
- 7.51%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CEMFX vs. FPADX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEMFX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FPADX's 0.08% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CEMFX vs. FPADX — Risk / Return Rank
CEMFX
FPADX
CEMFX vs. FPADX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cullen Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund (CEMFX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEMFX | FPADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.25 | 1.64 | +0.61 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.86 | 2.18 | +0.68 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.32 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.87 | 1.98 | +0.89 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.73 | 8.08 | +2.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEMFX | FPADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.25 | 1.64 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.21 | +0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.43 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.27 | +0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between CEMFX and FPADX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CEMFX vs. FPADX - Dividend Comparison
CEMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, less than FPADX's 2.35% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEMFX Cullen Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund | 2.03% | 1.72% | 3.31% | 4.68% | 1.26% | 2.62% | 2.13% | 4.16% | 2.26% | 3.59% | 3.65% | 4.60% |
FPADX Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund | 2.35% | 2.35% | 2.70% | 2.68% | 2.47% | 2.14% | 1.50% | 2.59% | 2.20% | 0.12% | 1.69% | 2.47% |
Drawdowns
CEMFX vs. FPADX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEMFX drawdown since its inception was -39.30%, roughly equal to the maximum FPADX drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEMFX and FPADX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEMFX | FPADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.30% | -39.16% | -0.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.41% | -13.28% | +0.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.13% | -37.04% | +8.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.30% | -39.16% | -0.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.41% | -13.28% | +0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.69% | -13.39% | +3.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.33% | 3.26% | +0.07% |
Volatility
CEMFX vs. FPADX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cullen Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund (CEMFX) is 6.95%, while Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX) has a volatility of 8.84%. This indicates that CEMFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FPADX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CEMFX | FPADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.95% | 8.84% | -1.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.42% | 13.29% | -0.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.42% | 17.59% | -1.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.09% | 16.64% | -2.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.92% | 17.60% | -2.68% |