CEMF.DE vs. XT01.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (CEMF.DE) and Xtrackers US Treasuries Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XT01.DE).
CEMF.DE and XT01.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CEMF.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the ICE US Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index. It was launched on Mar 28, 2024. XT01.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Government TR USD. It was launched on Sep 3, 2020. Both CEMF.DE and XT01.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CEMF.DE vs. XT01.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CEMF.DE vs. XT01.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CEMF.DE iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc | -1.01% | 2.59% |
XT01.DE Xtrackers US Treasuries Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF 1C | 2.89% | -0.10% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEMF.DE achieves a -1.01% return, which is significantly lower than XT01.DE's 2.89% return.
CEMF.DE
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -2.57%
- YTD
- -1.01%
- 6M
- -0.45%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XT01.DE
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 2.84%
- YTD
- 2.89%
- 6M
- 3.67%
- 1Y
- -2.54%
- 3Y*
- 2.69%
- 5Y*
- 3.66%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CEMF.DE vs. XT01.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEMF.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than XT01.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
CEMF.DE vs. XT01.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CEMF.DE
XT01.DE
CEMF.DE vs. XT01.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (CEMF.DE) and Xtrackers US Treasuries Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XT01.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEMF.DE | XT01.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.46 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between CEMF.DE and XT01.DE is -0.36. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
CEMF.DE vs. XT01.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CEMF.DE nor XT01.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
CEMF.DE vs. XT01.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEMF.DE drawdown since its inception was -3.14%, smaller than the maximum XT01.DE drawdown of -11.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEMF.DE and XT01.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEMF.DE | XT01.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.14% | -11.68% | +8.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -11.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.57% | -6.94% | +4.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.81% | -4.80% | +3.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.63% | — |
Volatility
CEMF.DE vs. XT01.DE - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CEMF.DE | XT01.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.97% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.96% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.42% | 7.13% | -2.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.42% | 7.45% | -3.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.42% | 7.32% | -2.90% |