CEMB vs. QCON
CEMB (iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF) and QCON (American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. CEMB is passively managed, while QCON is actively managed. CEMB charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for QCON.
Performance
CEMB vs. QCON - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CEMB
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 1.49%
- 6M
- 1.83%
- 1Y
- 7.31%
- 3Y*
- 7.31%
- 5Y*
- 1.97%
- 10Y*
- 3.49%
QCON
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CEMB vs. QCON - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CEMB iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF | 0.69% |
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF | 0.00% |
CEMB vs. QCON - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CEMB
QCON
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
CEMB
QCON
Basic Materials
CEMB
-
QCON
-
Communication Services
CEMB
-
QCON
-
Consumer Cyclical
CEMB
-
QCON
-
Consumer Defensive
CEMB
-
QCON
-
Energy
CEMB
-
QCON
-
Financial Services
CEMB
-
QCON
Healthcare
CEMB
-
QCON
-
Real Estate
CEMB
-
QCON
-
Technology
CEMB
-
QCON
-
Utilities
CEMB
-
QCON
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEMB vs. QCON — Risk / Return Rank
CEMB
QCON
CEMB vs. QCON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF (CEMB) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEMB | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.55 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.06 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEMB | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | — | — |
Drawdowns
CEMB vs. QCON - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEMB drawdown since its inception was -20.84%, which is greater than QCON's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEMB and QCON.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEMB | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.84% | 0.00% | -20.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.48% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | 0.00% | -0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.66% | 0.00% | -3.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.66% | — | — |
Volatility
CEMB vs. QCON - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEMB | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.08% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.43% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.06% | 0.00% | +3.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.63% | 0.00% | +5.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.30% | 0.00% | +6.30% |
CEMB vs. QCON - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEMB has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QCON's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
CEMB vs. QCON - Dividend Comparison
CEMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.13%, while QCON has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEMB iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF | 5.13% | 5.14% | 5.11% | 4.77% | 4.29% | 3.51% | 3.86% | 4.19% | 4.66% | 4.06% | 4.26% | 4.76% |
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, QCON is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QCON is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CEMB.
CEMB has the higher dividend yield at 5.13%, compared with 0.00% for QCON.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CEMB and 0.32% for QCON.
Find the right allocation for CEMB and QCON
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer