PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CELH vs. BLDR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CELH vs. BLDR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) and Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CELH achieves a -36.20% return, which is significantly lower than BLDR's -24.41% return. Over the past 10 years, CELH has outperformed BLDR with an annualized return of 42.47%, while BLDR has yielded a comparatively lower 21.56% annualized return.


CELH

1D
2.75%
1M
4.74%
YTD
-36.20%
6M
-33.44%
1Y
-30.49%
3Y*
-16.34%
5Y*
6.53%
10Y*
42.47%

BLDR

1D
-1.02%
1M
7.54%
YTD
-24.41%
6M
-28.31%
1Y
-32.40%
3Y*
-14.86%
5Y*
12.14%
10Y*
21.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CELH vs. BLDR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CELH
Celsius Holdings, Inc.
-36.20%73.65%-51.69%57.21%39.52%48.22%941.61%39.19%-33.90%114.29%
BLDR
Builders FirstSource, Inc.
-24.41%-28.01%-14.38%157.31%-24.30%110.02%60.61%132.91%-49.93%98.63%

Correlation

The correlation between CELH and BLDR is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.26

The correlation between CELH and BLDR shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.37 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CELH:

$7.58B

BLDR:

$8.54B

EPS

CELH:

$0.61

BLDR:

$2.63

PE Ratio

CELH:

47.66

BLDR:

29.54

PS Ratio

CELH:

2.39

BLDR:

0.58

PB Ratio

CELH:

19.03

BLDR:

2.13

Total Revenue (TTM)

CELH:

$2.97B

BLDR:

$14.82B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CELH:

$1.47B

BLDR:

$4.43B

EBITDA (TTM)

CELH:

$274.27M

BLDR:

$1.06B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CELH vs. BLDR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CELH
CELH Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
CELH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CELH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
CELH Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
CELH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
CELH Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

BLDR
BLDR Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
BLDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLDR Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
BLDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLDR Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CELH vs. BLDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) and Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CELHBLDRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

0.91

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.53

-0.59

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.01

-1.11

+0.10

CELH vs. BLDR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CELH Sharpe Ratio is -0.54, which is comparable to the BLDR Sharpe Ratio of -0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CELH and BLDR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CELH vs. BLDR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CELH drawdown since its inception was -77.86%, smaller than the maximum BLDR drawdown of -96.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CELH and BLDR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CELHBLDRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.86%

-96.78%

+18.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-57.22%

-55.51%

-1.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-77.86%

-68.55%

-9.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.86%

-68.55%

-9.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.86%

-68.55%

-9.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-69.64%

-63.16%

-6.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.92%

-47.87%

+19.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.17%

29.23%

+0.94%

Volatility

CELH vs. BLDR - Volatility Comparison

Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) has a higher volatility of 16.40% compared to Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) at 15.05%. This indicates that CELH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLDR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CELHBLDRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.40%

15.05%

+1.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.07%

34.74%

+2.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

56.39%

48.45%

+7.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

65.27%

45.30%

+19.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

68.91%

47.75%

+21.16%

Dividends

CELH vs. BLDR - Dividend Comparison

Neither CELH nor BLDR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

CELH vs. BLDR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Celsius Holdings, Inc. and Builders FirstSource, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B20222023202420252026
782.62M
3.29B
(CELH) Total Revenue
(BLDR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CELH vs. BLDR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Celsius Holdings, Inc. and Builders FirstSource, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
48.3%
28.3%
Portfolio components
CELH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celsius Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 378.07M and revenue of 782.62M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.3%.

BLDR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Builders FirstSource, Inc. reported a gross profit of 928.97M and revenue of 3.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.3%.

CELH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celsius Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 138.99M and revenue of 782.62M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.8%.

BLDR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Builders FirstSource, Inc. reported an operating income of 16.52M and revenue of 3.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.5%.

CELH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celsius Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 85.08M and revenue of 782.62M, resulting in a net margin of 10.9%.

BLDR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Builders FirstSource, Inc. reported a net income of -47.41M and revenue of 3.29B, resulting in a net margin of -1.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CELH and BLDR have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CELH has higher volatility (16.40%) compared to BLDR (15.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CELH dropped -77.86% vs BLDR's -96.78%.

CELH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.54 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CELH and BLDR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer