PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CELC vs. FNV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CELC vs. FNV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Celcuity Inc. (CELC) and Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CELC achieves a -13.39% return, which is significantly lower than FNV's 3.11% return.


CELC

1D
-1.44%
1M
-19.98%
6M
-21.06%
YTD
-13.39%
1Y
116.44%
3Y*
105.46%
5Y*
34.40%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
24.55%

FNV

1D
-3.81%
1M
-2.14%
6M
-8.81%
YTD
3.11%
1Y
32.69%
3Y*
15.42%
5Y*
6.93%
10Y*
11.68%
ALL TIME*
16.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$119.16M$168.28M$170.21M
$153.15M$143.97M$182.98M

CELC vs. FNV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CELC
Celcuity Inc.
-13.39%661.96%-10.16%4.00%6.22%44.00%-13.91%-55.65%26.60%53.44%
FNV
Franco-Nevada Corporation
3.11%77.81%7.41%-17.96%-0.39%11.57%22.31%48.92%-11.00%-0.80%

Correlation

The correlation between CELC and FNV is 0.12, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2017

0.05

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CELC:

$4.21B

FNV:

$41.06B

EPS

CELC:

-$3.81

FNV:

$7.10

PB Ratio

CELC:

87.89

FNV:

5.06

Total Revenue (TTM)

CELC:

$0.00

FNV:

$2.10B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CELC:

-$41.00K

FNV:

$1.61B

EBITDA (TTM)

CELC:

-$168.13M

FNV:

$1.96B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CELC vs. FNV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CELC
CELC Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
CELC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CELC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
CELC Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
CELC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
CELC Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

FNV
FNV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FNV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNV Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FNV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNV Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CELC vs. FNV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celcuity Inc. (CELC) and Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CELCFNVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.18

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

1.19

+1.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.33

2.59

+4.74

CELC vs. FNV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CELC Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is higher than the FNV Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CELC and FNV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CELC vs. FNV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CELC drawdown since its inception was -85.64%, which is greater than FNV's maximum drawdown of -58.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CELC and FNV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CELCFNVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.64%

-58.76%

-26.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.25%

-29.18%

-14.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.99%

-29.18%

-32.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.32%

-37.12%

-39.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.42%

-23.89%

-16.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.81%

-14.04%

-30.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.51%

13.44%

+3.07%

Volatility

CELC vs. FNV - Volatility Comparison

Celcuity Inc. (CELC) has a higher volatility of 26.36% compared to Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV) at 10.68%. This indicates that CELC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CELCFNVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.36%

10.68%

+15.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.17%

31.38%

+22.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

76.79%

37.79%

+39.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

101.04%

30.74%

+70.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

91.43%

30.25%

+61.18%

Dividends

CELC vs. FNV - Dividend Comparison

CELC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FNV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CELC
Celcuity Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FNV
Franco-Nevada Corporation
0.77%0.73%1.22%1.23%0.94%1.10%0.82%0.96%1.35%1.14%1.46%1.81%

Financials

CELC vs. FNV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Celcuity Inc. and Franco-Nevada Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CELC and FNV have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CELC has higher volatility (26.36%) compared to FNV (10.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CELC dropped -85.64% vs FNV's -58.76%.

CELC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CELC and FNV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer