CELC vs. FNV
CELC (Celcuity Inc.) and FNV (Franco-Nevada Corporation) are both stocks. CELC operates in Diagnostics & Research (Healthcare), while FNV operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, CELC returned 28.02%/yr vs 10.28%/yr for FNV. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CELC vs. FNV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CELC achieves a -7.29% return, which is significantly lower than FNV's 14.03% return.
CELC
- 1D
- 3.96%
- 1M
- -34.74%
- YTD
- -7.29%
- 6M
- -12.66%
- 1Y
- 671.87%
- 3Y*
- 104.58%
- 5Y*
- 28.02%
- 10Y*
- —
FNV
- 1D
- 2.99%
- 1M
- 4.85%
- YTD
- 14.03%
- 6M
- 16.48%
- 1Y
- 34.31%
- 3Y*
- 18.11%
- 5Y*
- 10.28%
- 10Y*
- 14.28%
CELC vs. FNV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CELC Celcuity Inc. | -7.29% | 661.96% | -10.16% | 4.00% | 6.22% | 44.00% | -13.91% | -55.65% | 26.60% | 32.61% |
FNV Franco-Nevada Corporation | 14.03% | 77.81% | 7.41% | -17.96% | -0.39% | 11.57% | 22.31% | 48.92% | -11.00% | 1.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between CELC and FNV is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2017 | 0.05 |
Fundamentals
CELC:
$5.04B
FNV:
$45.59B
CELC:
-$3.95
FNV:
$7.10
CELC:
94.09
FNV:
5.61
CELC:
$0.00
FNV:
$2.10B
CELC:
-$41.00K
FNV:
$1.61B
CELC:
-$168.13M
FNV:
$1.96B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CELC vs. FNV — Risk / Return Rank
CELC
FNV
CELC vs. FNV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celcuity Inc. (CELC) and Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CELC | FNV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.94 | 1.19 | +0.75 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 17.55 | 1.67 | +15.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 75.51 | 3.56 | +71.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CELC | FNV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.72 | 0.98 | +2.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.34 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.47 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
CELC vs. FNV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CELC drawdown since its inception was -85.64%, which is greater than FNV's maximum drawdown of -58.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CELC and FNV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CELC | FNV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.64% | -58.76% | -26.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.65% | -20.62% | -18.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.99% | -29.64% | -32.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.70% | -37.12% | -45.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.22% | -15.83% | -20.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.00% | -13.96% | -31.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.96% | 9.92% | -0.96% |
Volatility
CELC vs. FNV - Volatility Comparison
Celcuity Inc. (CELC) has a higher volatility of 33.95% compared to Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV) at 10.89%. This indicates that CELC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CELC | FNV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 33.95% | 10.89% | +23.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.49% | 29.04% | +20.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 182.53% | 35.34% | +147.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 101.46% | 30.15% | +71.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 91.63% | 30.08% | +61.55% |
Dividends
CELC vs. FNV - Dividend Comparison
CELC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FNV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CELC Celcuity Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNV Franco-Nevada Corporation | 0.67% | 0.73% | 1.22% | 1.23% | 0.94% | 1.10% | 0.82% | 0.96% | 1.35% | 1.14% | 1.46% | 1.81% |
Financials
CELC vs. FNV - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Celcuity Inc. and Franco-Nevada Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CELC and FNV have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CELC has higher volatility (33.95%) compared to FNV (10.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CELC dropped -85.64% vs FNV's -58.76%.
CELC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.72 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CELC and FNV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer