PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CEGI.L vs. QQQO.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CEGI.L vs. QQQO.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX Crypto Equity Income & Growth UCITS ETF Distributing (CEGI.L) and IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP (QQQO.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CEGI.L is traded in USD, while QQQO.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the QQQO.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEGI.L achieves a 21.78% return, which is significantly higher than QQQO.L's 10.57% return.


CEGI.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-7.68%
6M
11.56%
YTD
21.78%
1Y
36.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQO.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-2.91%
6M
10.27%
YTD
10.57%
1Y
25.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEGI.L vs. QQQO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CEGI.L and QQQO.L is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2025

0.57

The correlation between CEGI.L and QQQO.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CEGI.L vs. QQQO.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEGI.L
CEGI.L Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
CEGI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEGI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEGI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
CEGI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEGI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQO.L
QQQO.L Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
QQQO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEGI.L vs. QQQO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX Crypto Equity Income & Growth UCITS ETF Distributing (CEGI.L) and IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP (QQQO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CEGI.LQQQO.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.31

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

0.93

+0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.85

1.40

+1.45

CEGI.L vs. QQQO.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEGI.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is higher than the QQQO.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEGI.L and QQQO.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CEGI.L vs. QQQO.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEGI.L drawdown since its inception was -27.98%, roughly equal to the maximum QQQO.L drawdown of -27.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEGI.L and QQQO.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CEGI.LQQQO.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.98%

-27.72%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.98%

-27.72%

-0.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.97%

-15.59%

+6.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.52%

-10.06%

+0.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.70%

18.36%

-5.66%

Volatility

CEGI.L vs. QQQO.L - Volatility Comparison

REX Crypto Equity Income & Growth UCITS ETF Distributing (CEGI.L) has a higher volatility of 9.85% compared to IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP (QQQO.L) at 6.71%. This indicates that CEGI.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CEGI.LQQQO.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.85%

6.71%

+3.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.58%

11.91%

+13.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.16%

43.63%

-8.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.79%

5,487.63%

-5,452.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.79%

5,487.63%

-5,452.84%

CEGI.L vs. QQQO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEGI.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQO.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

CEGI.L vs. QQQO.L - Dividend Comparison

CEGI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.49%, less than QQQO.L's 77.51% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


CEGI.L and QQQO.L have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QQQO.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QQQO.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CEGI.L.

CEGI.L is categorized as Derivative Income, while QQQO.L is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: REX and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CEGI.L and 0.45% for QQQO.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CEGI.L and QQQO.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer