CEG vs. SCHD
CEG (Constellation Energy Corp) is a stock, while SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) is Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Over the past 3 years, CEG returned 42.45%/yr vs 13.78%/yr for SCHD. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CEG vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEG achieves a -26.38% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 18.32% return.
CEG
- 1D
- -1.78%
- 1M
- -9.88%
- YTD
- -26.38%
- 6M
- -27.42%
- 1Y
- -18.58%
- 3Y*
- 42.45%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHD
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -0.97%
- YTD
- 18.32%
- 6M
- 17.51%
- 1Y
- 25.44%
- 3Y*
- 13.78%
- 5Y*
- 8.65%
- 10Y*
- 12.43%
CEG vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEG Constellation Energy Corp | -26.38% | 58.80% | 92.71% | 37.24% | 73.87% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 18.32% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -1.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEG and SCHD is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2022 | 0.26 |
The correlation between CEG and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEG vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
CEG
SCHD
CEG vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Constellation Energy Corp (CEG) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CEG | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.41 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.47 | 5.54 | -6.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.91 | 13.29 | -14.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CEG vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEG drawdown since its inception was -50.70%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEG and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEG | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.70% | -33.37% | -17.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.77% | -4.61% | -35.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -50.70% | -16.13% | -34.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.54% | -1.97% | -33.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.87% | -3.31% | -8.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.49% | 1.92% | +18.57% |
Volatility
CEG vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
Constellation Energy Corp (CEG) has a higher volatility of 12.41% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.16%. This indicates that CEG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEG | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.41% | 3.16% | +9.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.91% | 7.75% | +28.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.60% | 11.06% | +35.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.23% | 14.36% | +34.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.23% | 16.69% | +32.54% |
Dividends
CEG vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
CEG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than SCHD's 3.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEG Constellation Energy Corp | 0.63% | 0.44% | 0.63% | 0.97% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.28% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CEG and SCHD have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CEG has higher volatility (12.41%) compared to SCHD (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CEG dropped -50.70% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CEG and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer