CEG vs. MSFT
CEG (Constellation Energy Corp) and MSFT (Microsoft Corporation) are both stocks. CEG operates in Utilities - Renewable (Utilities), while MSFT operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past 3 years, CEG returned 40.69%/yr vs 12.25%/yr for MSFT. Their 0.30 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CEG vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEG achieves a -25.41% return, which is significantly lower than MSFT's -3.48% return.
CEG
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 11.10%
- 6M
- -6.12%
- YTD
- -25.41%
- 1Y
- -24.07%
- 3Y*
- 40.69%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 45.86%
MSFT
- 1D
- 3.02%
- 1M
- 20.93%
- 6M
- 8.48%
- YTD
- -3.48%
- 1Y
- -12.20%
- 3Y*
- 12.25%
- 5Y*
- 11.19%
- 10Y*
- 24.97%
- ALL TIME*
- 25.16%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $725.89M | $725.77M | $982.35M | |
| $17.39B | $14.79B | $16.23B |
CEG vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEG Constellation Energy Corp | -25.41% | 58.80% | 92.71% | 37.24% | 73.87% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | -3.48% | 15.58% | 12.93% | 58.19% | -21.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEG and MSFT is 0.14, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2022 | 0.30 |
The correlation between CEG and MSFT shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CEG:
$94.35B
MSFT:
$3.45T
CEG:
$8.04
MSFT:
$17.94
CEG:
32.66
MSFT:
25.91
CEG:
0.57
MSFT:
1.50
CEG:
3.47
MSFT:
10.44
CEG:
2.78
MSFT:
7.83
CEG:
$24.82B
MSFT:
$331.84B
CEG:
$20.98B
MSFT:
$225.47B
CEG:
$5.87B
MSFT:
$207.52B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEG vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank
CEG
MSFT
CEG vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Constellation Energy Corp (CEG) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CEG | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 0.95 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | -0.35 | -0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.04 | -0.63 | -0.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CEG vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEG drawdown since its inception was -50.70%, smaller than the maximum MSFT drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEG and MSFT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEG | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.70% | -69.38% | +18.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.22% | -34.50% | -6.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -50.70% | -34.50% | -16.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.69% | -13.73% | -20.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.37% | -21.80% | +9.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.25% | 19.35% | +3.90% |
Volatility
CEG vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Constellation Energy Corp (CEG) is 9.71%, while Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) has a volatility of 15.97%. This indicates that CEG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEG | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.71% | 15.97% | -6.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.35% | 26.41% | +7.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.84% | 31.93% | +14.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.04% | 28.00% | +21.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.04% | 27.62% | +21.42% |
Dividends
CEG vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison
CEG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than MSFT's 0.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEG Constellation Energy Corp | 0.62% | 0.44% | 0.63% | 0.97% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 0.77% | 0.70% | 0.73% | 0.74% | 1.06% | 0.68% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 1.69% | 1.86% | 2.37% | 2.33% |
Financials
CEG vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Constellation Energy Corp and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CEG vs. MSFT - Profitability Comparison
CEG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Constellation Energy Corp reported a gross profit of 2.48B and revenue of 6.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.8%.
MSFT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a gross profit of 60.48B and revenue of 90.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.2%.
CEG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Constellation Energy Corp reported an operating income of 598.00M and revenue of 6.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.
MSFT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported an operating income of 40.60B and revenue of 90.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 45.1%.
CEG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Constellation Energy Corp reported a net income of 432.00M and revenue of 6.07B, resulting in a net margin of 7.1%.
MSFT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a net income of 35.77B and revenue of 90.01B, resulting in a net margin of 39.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CEG and MSFT have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSFT has higher volatility (15.97%) compared to CEG (9.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CEG dropped -50.70% vs MSFT's -69.38%.
MSFT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.39 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CEG and MSFT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer