CEG vs. AIA
CEG (Constellation Energy Corp) is a stock, while AIA (iShares Asia 50 ETF) is Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the S&P Asia 50. Over the past 3 years, CEG returned 40.06%/yr vs 34.57%/yr for AIA. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CEG vs. AIA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEG achieves a -27.96% return, which is significantly lower than AIA's 44.56% return.
CEG
- 1D
- 2.86%
- 1M
- -5.03%
- YTD
- -27.96%
- 6M
- -27.70%
- 1Y
- -14.08%
- 3Y*
- 40.06%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AIA
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 6.70%
- YTD
- 44.56%
- 6M
- 50.54%
- 1Y
- 83.79%
- 3Y*
- 34.57%
- 5Y*
- 11.52%
- 10Y*
- 15.05%
CEG vs. AIA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEG Constellation Energy Corp | -27.96% | 58.80% | 92.71% | 37.24% | 73.87% |
AIA iShares Asia 50 ETF | 44.56% | 47.79% | 20.26% | 4.32% | -25.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEG and AIA is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2022 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEG vs. AIA — Risk / Return Rank
CEG
AIA
CEG vs. AIA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Constellation Energy Corp (CEG) and iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CEG | AIA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.49 | -0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.38 | 5.70 | -6.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.78 | 19.76 | -20.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CEG vs. AIA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEG drawdown since its inception was -50.70%, smaller than the maximum AIA drawdown of -60.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEG and AIA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEG | AIA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.70% | -60.89% | +10.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.77% | -14.15% | -25.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -50.70% | -21.64% | -29.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -50.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -54.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.93% | -6.44% | -30.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.67% | -16.66% | +4.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.38% | 4.08% | +15.30% |
Volatility
CEG vs. AIA - Volatility Comparison
Constellation Energy Corp (CEG) has a higher volatility of 15.26% compared to iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) at 14.34%. This indicates that CEG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AIA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEG | AIA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.26% | 14.34% | +0.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.72% | 24.49% | +13.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.66% | 27.93% | +18.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.38% | 25.96% | +23.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.38% | 23.78% | +25.60% |
Dividends
CEG vs. AIA - Dividend Comparison
CEG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than AIA's 1.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIA iShares Asia 50 ETF | 1.73% | 2.50% | 2.78% | 2.07% | 2.59% | 1.54% | 1.11% | 2.24% | 2.49% | 1.45% | 2.29% | 2.88% |
CEG Constellation Energy Corp | 0.64% | 0.44% | 0.63% | 0.97% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CEG and AIA have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CEG has higher volatility (15.26%) compared to AIA (14.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CEG dropped -50.70% vs AIA's -60.89%.
AIA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CEG and AIA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer