CEFZ vs. TFLO

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

CEFZ (RiverNorth Active Income ETF) and TFLO (iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CEFZ is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by RiverNorth, while TFLO is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Index. CEFZ is actively managed, while TFLO is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. CEFZ charges 3.36%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for TFLO.

Performance

CEFZ vs. TFLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RiverNorth Active Income ETF (CEFZ) and iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEFZ achieves a 4.59% return, which is significantly higher than TFLO's 1.79% return.

CEFZ

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: -0.03%
• YTD: 4.59%
• 6M: 5.08%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TFLO

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.29%
• YTD: 1.79%
• 6M: 1.91%
• 1Y: 3.95%
• 3Y*: 4.72%
• 5Y*: 3.68%
• 10Y*: 2.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEFZ vs. TFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CEFZ RiverNorth Active Income ETF	4.59%	7.41%
TFLO iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF	1.79%	1.62%

Correlation

The correlation between CEFZ and TFLO is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2025	-0.08

Return for Risk

CEFZ vs. TFLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEFZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TFLO

TFLO Risk / Return Rank: 100
TFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
TFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
TFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 100
TFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
TFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEFZ vs. TFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverNorth Active Income ETF (CEFZ) and iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CEFZ	TFLO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	13.86	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	49.00	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	13.08	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	200.18	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	818.95	—

Drawdowns

CEFZ vs. TFLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEFZ drawdown since its inception was -6.66%, which is greater than TFLO's maximum drawdown of -5.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEFZ and TFLO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CEFZ	TFLO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.66%	-5.01%	-1.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.02%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.04%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-0.13%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-0.16%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.28%	0.00%	-1.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.20%	-0.10%	-1.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.00%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CEFZ	TFLO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.08%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.20%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.42%	0.29%	+10.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.42%	0.35%	+10.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.42%	0.46%	+9.96%

CEFZ vs. TFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEFZ has a 3.36% expense ratio, which is higher than TFLO's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

CEFZ vs. TFLO - Dividend Comparison

CEFZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.32%, more than TFLO's 3.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CEFZ RiverNorth Active Income ETF	8.32%	4.17%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TFLO iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF	3.89%	4.16%	5.21%	4.88%	1.68%	0.00%	0.36%	2.08%	1.65%	0.86%	0.31%	0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CEFZ and TFLO in my portfolio?

CEFZ and TFLO have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CEFZ or TFLO?

On fees, TFLO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CEFZ or TFLO?

TFLO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 3.36% for CEFZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CEFZ or TFLO?

CEFZ has the higher dividend yield at 8.32%, compared with 3.89% for TFLO.

What is the main difference between CEFZ and TFLO?

CEFZ is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while TFLO is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: RiverNorth and iShares. Their fees differ too: 3.36% for CEFZ and 0.15% for TFLO.