CEFZ vs. ALLW
Compare and contrast key facts about RiverNorth Active Income ETF (CEFZ) and SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW).
CEFZ and ALLW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CEFZ is an actively managed fund by RiverNorth. It was launched on Aug 4, 2025. ALLW is an actively managed fund by State Street. It was launched on Mar 5, 2025.
Performance
CEFZ vs. ALLW - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CEFZ vs. ALLW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CEFZ RiverNorth Active Income ETF | -1.73% | 7.67% |
ALLW SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF | 4.95% | 9.36% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEFZ achieves a -1.73% return, which is significantly lower than ALLW's 4.95% return.
CEFZ
- 1D
- 1.92%
- 1M
- -3.47%
- YTD
- -1.73%
- 6M
- 0.69%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ALLW
- 1D
- 1.98%
- 1M
- -4.28%
- YTD
- 4.95%
- 6M
- 8.24%
- 1Y
- 19.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CEFZ vs. ALLW - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEFZ has a 3.36% expense ratio, which is higher than ALLW's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CEFZ vs. ALLW — Risk / Return Rank
CEFZ
ALLW
CEFZ vs. ALLW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverNorth Active Income ETF (CEFZ) and SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEFZ | ALLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.87 | 1.51 | -0.65 |
Correlation
The correlation between CEFZ and ALLW is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CEFZ vs. ALLW - Dividend Comparison
CEFZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.96%, more than ALLW's 4.45% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CEFZ RiverNorth Active Income ETF | 6.96% | 4.17% |
ALLW SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF | 4.45% | 4.67% |
Drawdowns
CEFZ vs. ALLW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEFZ drawdown since its inception was -6.66%, smaller than the maximum ALLW drawdown of -8.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEFZ and ALLW.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEFZ | ALLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.66% | -8.78% | +2.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.87% | -4.28% | -0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.23% | -1.18% | -0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.02% | — |
Volatility
CEFZ vs. ALLW - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CEFZ | ALLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.41% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.56% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.43% | 13.08% | -2.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.43% | 12.83% | -2.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.43% | 12.83% | -2.40% |