PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CEFIX vs. FPADX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CEFIX vs. FPADX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert Emerging Markets Advancement Fund (CEFIX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEFIX achieves a 27.78% return, which is significantly lower than FPADX's 30.04% return.


CEFIX

1D
0.25%
1M
12.00%
YTD
27.78%
6M
30.92%
1Y
57.58%
3Y*
27.81%
5Y*
12.10%
10Y*

FPADX

1D
1.25%
1M
10.70%
YTD
30.04%
6M
32.95%
1Y
58.94%
3Y*
24.97%
5Y*
7.99%
10Y*
10.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEFIX vs. FPADX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CEFIX
Calvert Emerging Markets Advancement Fund
27.78%38.50%11.21%11.61%-15.07%0.27%15.35%10.46%
FPADX
Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund
30.04%33.90%6.80%9.51%-20.06%-3.07%17.84%12.73%

Correlation

The correlation between CEFIX and FPADX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2019

0.91

The correlation between CEFIX and FPADX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CEFIX vs. FPADX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEFIX
CEFIX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
CEFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
CEFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

FPADX
FPADX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FPADX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPADX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPADX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
FPADX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPADX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEFIX vs. FPADX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Emerging Markets Advancement Fund (CEFIX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CEFIXFPADXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

1.62

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.19

4.48

-0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.86

17.77

-0.91

CEFIX vs. FPADX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEFIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.26, which is comparable to the FPADX Sharpe Ratio of 3.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEFIX and FPADX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CEFIXFPADXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.26

3.34

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.47

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.37

+0.43

Drawdowns

CEFIX vs. FPADX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEFIX drawdown since its inception was -30.73%, smaller than the maximum FPADX drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEFIX and FPADX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CEFIXFPADXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.73%

-39.16%

+8.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.87%

-13.28%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.87%

-16.09%

+2.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.41%

-37.00%

+12.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.59%

-13.26%

+3.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

3.34%

+0.10%

Volatility

CEFIX vs. FPADX - Volatility Comparison

Calvert Emerging Markets Advancement Fund (CEFIX) has a higher volatility of 8.29% compared to Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX) at 7.57%. This indicates that CEFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FPADX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CEFIXFPADXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.29%

7.57%

+0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.90%

15.40%

+0.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.81%

17.80%

+0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.38%

17.11%

-1.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.46%

17.82%

-0.36%

CEFIX vs. FPADX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEFIX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than FPADX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

CEFIX vs. FPADX - Dividend Comparison

CEFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, more than FPADX's 1.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CEFIX
Calvert Emerging Markets Advancement Fund
2.45%3.13%1.76%3.20%5.51%4.57%0.13%0.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FPADX
Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund
1.81%2.35%2.70%2.68%2.47%2.14%1.50%2.59%2.20%0.12%1.69%2.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, CEFIX and FPADX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CEFIX has higher volatility (8.29%) compared to FPADX (7.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CEFIX dropped -30.73% vs FPADX's -39.16%.

FPADX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs 3.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CEFIX and FPADX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer