PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CEF.TO vs. VUN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CEF.TO vs. VUN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF.TO) and Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF (VUN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEF.TO achieves a 3.63% return, which is significantly lower than VUN.TO's 13.00% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CEF.TO having a 14.86% annualized return and VUN.TO not far ahead at 15.54%.


CEF.TO

1D
1.07%
1M
1.67%
YTD
3.63%
6M
11.95%
1Y
58.70%
3Y*
37.78%
5Y*
21.95%
10Y*
14.86%

VUN.TO

1D
0.51%
1M
6.61%
YTD
13.00%
6M
10.91%
1Y
30.37%
3Y*
23.24%
5Y*
15.62%
10Y*
15.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEF.TO vs. VUN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CEF.TO
Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust
3.63%83.74%34.77%4.70%7.88%-8.74%29.32%11.22%1.48%10.21%
VUN.TO
Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF
13.00%11.43%33.76%23.00%-14.20%24.54%18.22%23.99%2.35%13.01%

Correlation

The correlation between CEF.TO and VUN.TO is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2013

-0.03

The correlation between CEF.TO and VUN.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (all time) to 0.14 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CEF.TO vs. VUN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEF.TO
CEF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
CEF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
CEF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

VUN.TO
VUN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VUN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
VUN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEF.TO vs. VUN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF.TO) and Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF (VUN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CEF.TOVUN.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.47

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.30

3.58

-1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.77

13.42

-7.65

CEF.TO vs. VUN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is lower than the VUN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEF.TO and VUN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CEF.TOVUN.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.62

2.55

-0.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

1.02

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.94

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

1.01

-0.87

Drawdowns

CEF.TO vs. VUN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEF.TO drawdown since its inception was -58.68%, which is greater than VUN.TO's maximum drawdown of -28.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEF.TO and VUN.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CEF.TOVUN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.68%

-28.19%

-30.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.60%

-8.51%

-17.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.60%

-19.88%

-5.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.60%

-23.67%

-1.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.04%

-28.19%

-0.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.38%

0.00%

-19.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.41%

-3.80%

-26.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.20%

2.27%

+7.93%

Volatility

CEF.TO vs. VUN.TO - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF.TO) has a higher volatility of 10.19% compared to Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF (VUN.TO) at 2.96%. This indicates that CEF.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CEF.TOVUN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.19%

2.96%

+7.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.87%

8.82%

+25.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.49%

11.95%

+24.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.90%

15.43%

+7.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.33%

16.70%

+4.63%

Dividends

CEF.TO vs. VUN.TO - Dividend Comparison

CEF.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VUN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CEF.TO
Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.08%0.09%0.09%
VUN.TO
Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF
0.74%0.84%0.93%1.10%1.21%0.97%1.15%1.45%1.52%1.39%1.49%1.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


CEF.TO and VUN.TO have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CEF.TO and VUN.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer