CEBT.DE vs. REMX
CEBT.DE (iShares Essential Metals Producers UCITS ETF USD Acc) and REMX (VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CEBT.DE is a Materials fund tracking the S&P Global Essential Metals Producers Index, while REMX is a Rare Earth & Strategic Metals fund tracking the MarketVector Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CEBT.DE returned 90.45% vs 133.07% for REMX. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CEBT.DE charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for REMX.
Performance
CEBT.DE vs. REMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CEBT.DE is traded in EUR, while REMX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the REMX values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEBT.DE achieves a 6.75% return, which is significantly lower than REMX's 24.73% return.
CEBT.DE
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -11.82%
- YTD
- 6.75%
- 6M
- 8.25%
- 1Y
- 90.45%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
REMX
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- -7.76%
- YTD
- 24.73%
- 6M
- 21.43%
- 1Y
- 133.07%
- 3Y*
- 2.96%
- 5Y*
- 4.64%
- 10Y*
- 9.62%
CEBT.DE vs. REMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CEBT.DE iShares Essential Metals Producers UCITS ETF USD Acc | 6.75% | 73.56% | -5.48% | 6.83% |
REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF | 24.73% | 70.05% | -30.73% | 1.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEBT.DE and REMX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2023 | 0.64 |
The correlation between CEBT.DE and REMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEBT.DE vs. REMX — Risk / Return Rank
CEBT.DE
REMX
CEBT.DE vs. REMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Essential Metals Producers UCITS ETF USD Acc (CEBT.DE) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CEBT.DE | REMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.37 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.90 | 5.93 | -2.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.91 | 15.57 | -2.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CEBT.DE vs. REMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEBT.DE drawdown since its inception was -39.60%, smaller than the maximum REMX drawdown of -87.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEBT.DE and REMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEBT.DE | REMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.60% | -87.35% | +47.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.07% | -22.56% | -0.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -61.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -73.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -73.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.85% | -48.12% | +31.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.36% | -60.52% | +49.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.98% | 8.58% | -1.60% |
Volatility
CEBT.DE vs. REMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Essential Metals Producers UCITS ETF USD Acc (CEBT.DE) is 13.11%, while VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) has a volatility of 15.70%. This indicates that CEBT.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEBT.DE | REMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.11% | 15.70% | -2.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.29% | 35.86% | -4.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.21% | 49.35% | -13.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.77% | 39.06% | -8.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.77% | 36.25% | -5.48% |
CEBT.DE vs. REMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEBT.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than REMX's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
CEBT.DE vs. REMX - Dividend Comparison
CEBT.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while REMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEBT.DE iShares Essential Metals Producers UCITS ETF USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF | 1.46% | 1.76% | 2.56% | 0.00% | 1.56% | 5.25% | 0.81% | 1.64% | 12.43% | 2.89% | 2.23% | 4.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CEBT.DE and REMX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CEBT.DE is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CEBT.DE is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for REMX.
CEBT.DE is categorized as Materials, while REMX is Rare Earth & Strategic Metals. CEBT.DE tracks S&P Global Essential Metals Producers Index, while REMX tracks MarketVector Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for CEBT.DE and 0.59% for REMX.
Find the right allocation for CEBT.DE and REMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer