CEBT.DE vs. 5MVW.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CEBT.DE (iShares Essential Metals Producers UCITS ETF USD Acc) and 5MVW.DE (iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - CEBT.DE is a Materials fund tracking the S&P Global Essential Metals Producers Index, while 5MVW.DE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Energy. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CEBT.DE returned 117.63% vs 44.87% for 5MVW.DE. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CEBT.DE charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for 5MVW.DE.

Performance

CEBT.DE vs. 5MVW.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Essential Metals Producers UCITS ETF USD Acc (CEBT.DE) and iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (5MVW.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEBT.DE achieves a 22.00% return, which is significantly lower than 5MVW.DE's 32.79% return.

CEBT.DE

• 1D: -1.64%
• 1M: 7.56%
• YTD: 22.00%
• 6M: 34.58%
• 1Y: 117.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

5MVW.DE

• 1D: -0.61%
• 1M: -0.86%
• YTD: 32.79%
• 6M: 29.07%
• 1Y: 44.87%
• 3Y*: 15.65%
• 5Y*: 20.31%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEBT.DE vs. 5MVW.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CEBT.DE iShares Essential Metals Producers UCITS ETF USD Acc	22.00%	73.56%	-5.48%	7.42%
5MVW.DE iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	32.79%	2.17%	7.57%	-8.25%

Correlation

The correlation between CEBT.DE and 5MVW.DE is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2023	0.22

The correlation between CEBT.DE and 5MVW.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CEBT.DE vs. 5MVW.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEBT.DE

CEBT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 87
CEBT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
CEBT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
CEBT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 83
CEBT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
CEBT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 87

5MVW.DE

5MVW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 60
5MVW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
5MVW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
5MVW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 62
5MVW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
5MVW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEBT.DE vs. 5MVW.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Essential Metals Producers UCITS ETF USD Acc (CEBT.DE) and iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (5MVW.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CEBT.DE	5MVW.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.41	2.10	+1.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.77	2.59	+1.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.37	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.07	2.97	+2.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.35	9.81	+8.54
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CEBT.DE vs. 5MVW.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEBT.DE Sharpe Ratio is 3.41, which is higher than the 5MVW.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEBT.DE and 5MVW.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CEBT.DE	5MVW.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.41	2.10	+1.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.84	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.12	0.45	+0.67

Drawdowns

CEBT.DE vs. 5MVW.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEBT.DE drawdown since its inception was -39.60%, smaller than the maximum 5MVW.DE drawdown of -56.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEBT.DE and 5MVW.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	CEBT.DE	5MVW.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.60%	-56.87%	+17.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.07%	-15.05%	-8.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.76%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.76%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.97%	-7.49%	+2.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.32%	-13.53%	+2.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.39%	4.56%	+1.83%

Volatility

CEBT.DE vs. 5MVW.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Essential Metals Producers UCITS ETF USD Acc (CEBT.DE) has a higher volatility of 12.34% compared to iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (5MVW.DE) at 6.76%. This indicates that CEBT.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 5MVW.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CEBT.DE	5MVW.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.34%	6.76%	+5.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.99%	18.33%	+10.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.31%	21.33%	+12.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.18%	23.99%	+6.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.18%	29.20%	+0.98%

CEBT.DE vs. 5MVW.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEBT.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than 5MVW.DE's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

CEBT.DE vs. 5MVW.DE - Dividend Comparison

CEBT.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while 5MVW.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
5MVW.DE iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	2.48%	3.29%	3.54%	3.64%	3.41%	3.49%	5.08%	0.63%
CEBT.DE iShares Essential Metals Producers UCITS ETF USD Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CEBT.DE and 5MVW.DE in my portfolio?

CEBT.DE and 5MVW.DE have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CEBT.DE or 5MVW.DE?

On fees, 5MVW.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CEBT.DE or 5MVW.DE?

5MVW.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for CEBT.DE.

What is the main difference between CEBT.DE and 5MVW.DE?

CEBT.DE is categorized as Materials, while 5MVW.DE is Energy Equities. CEBT.DE tracks S&P Global Essential Metals Producers Index, while 5MVW.DE tracks MSCI World Energy. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for CEBT.DE and 0.18% for 5MVW.DE.