PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CE71.L vs. GLTS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CE71.L vs. GLTS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Euro Government Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (CE71.L) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF (GLTS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CE71.L is traded in GBp, while GLTS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the GLTS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CE71.L achieves a -1.10% return, which is significantly lower than GLTS.L's 0.31% return. Over the past 10 years, CE71.L has outperformed GLTS.L with an annualized return of 1.36%, while GLTS.L has yielded a comparatively lower 0.65% annualized return.


CE71.L

1D
0.20%
1M
0.75%
YTD
-1.10%
6M
-1.03%
1Y
3.12%
3Y*
2.91%
5Y*
-0.55%
10Y*
1.36%

GLTS.L

1D
0.14%
1M
0.75%
YTD
0.31%
6M
0.39%
1Y
2.99%
3Y*
4.00%
5Y*
0.80%
10Y*
0.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CE71.L vs. GLTS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CE71.L
iShares Euro Government Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF (Acc)
-1.10%7.79%-2.51%3.91%-7.07%-8.68%8.08%-2.38%0.86%6.21%
GLTS.L
SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF
0.31%5.40%1.76%3.70%-5.72%-1.91%1.77%1.11%0.41%-0.65%

Correlation

The correlation between CE71.L and GLTS.L is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2014

0.28

The correlation between CE71.L and GLTS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.44 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CE71.L vs. GLTS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CE71.L
CE71.L Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
CE71.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CE71.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
CE71.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
CE71.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
CE71.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

GLTS.L
GLTS.L Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
GLTS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLTS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLTS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GLTS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLTS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CE71.L vs. GLTS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Euro Government Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (CE71.L) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF (GLTS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CE71.LGLTS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.23

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.74

1.34

-0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.76

4.26

-2.50

CE71.L vs. GLTS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CE71.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the GLTS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CE71.L and GLTS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CE71.LGLTS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

1.25

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

0.24

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

0.25

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.34

-0.16

Drawdowns

CE71.L vs. GLTS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CE71.L drawdown since its inception was -19.41%, which is greater than GLTS.L's maximum drawdown of -11.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CE71.L and GLTS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CE71.LGLTS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.41%

-11.18%

-8.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.18%

-2.22%

-1.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.12%

-2.22%

-2.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.10%

-10.44%

-3.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.41%

-11.18%

-8.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.79%

-0.91%

-8.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.39%

-1.72%

-8.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.77%

0.70%

+1.07%

Volatility

CE71.L vs. GLTS.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Euro Government Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (CE71.L) has a higher volatility of 1.52% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF (GLTS.L) at 0.84%. This indicates that CE71.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLTS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CE71.LGLTS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.52%

0.84%

+0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.66%

2.01%

+1.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.84%

2.39%

+2.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.36%

3.25%

+3.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.25%

2.62%

+6.63%

CE71.L vs. GLTS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CE71.L and GLTS.L have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CE71.L vs. GLTS.L - Dividend Comparison

CE71.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GLTS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CE71.L
iShares Euro Government Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GLTS.L
SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF
3.63%3.44%2.74%1.30%0.18%0.13%0.46%0.60%0.39%0.52%0.88%0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


CE71.L and GLTS.L have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CE71.L and GLTS.L have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

CE71.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Agg Govt TR EUR, while GLTS.L tracks FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CE71.L and GLTS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer