PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CE31.L vs. GILS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CE31.L vs. GILS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Euro Government Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (CE31.L) and Lyxor Core UK Government Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (GILS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CE31.L achieves a -0.69% return, which is significantly higher than GILS.L's -1.13% return. Over the past 10 years, CE31.L has outperformed GILS.L with an annualized return of 1.34%, while GILS.L has yielded a comparatively lower -3.33% annualized return.


CE31.L

1D
0.18%
1M
0.53%
YTD
-0.69%
6M
-0.65%
1Y
3.69%
3Y*
2.80%
5Y*
0.96%
10Y*
1.34%

GILS.L

1D
0.22%
1M
1.40%
YTD
-1.13%
6M
-4.27%
1Y
-0.95%
3Y*
-0.26%
5Y*
-6.53%
10Y*
-3.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CE31.L vs. GILS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CE31.L
iShares Euro Government Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc)
-0.69%7.55%-1.61%1.46%1.17%-7.40%5.40%-4.80%0.64%3.54%
GILS.L
Lyxor Core UK Government Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
-1.13%1.70%-5.79%1.51%-25.53%-6.84%5.96%4.09%-2.08%-1.13%

Correlation

The correlation between CE31.L and GILS.L is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2013

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CE31.L vs. GILS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CE31.L
CE31.L Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
CE31.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CE31.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
CE31.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
CE31.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
CE31.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

GILS.L
GILS.L Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
GILS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GILS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
GILS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
GILS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
GILS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CE31.L vs. GILS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Euro Government Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (CE31.L) and Lyxor Core UK Government Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (GILS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CE31.LGILS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

0.98

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

-0.15

+1.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.13

-0.34

+3.47

CE31.L vs. GILS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CE31.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is higher than the GILS.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CE31.L and GILS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CE31.LGILS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

-0.14

+1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

-0.65

+0.83

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

-0.37

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.01

+0.07

Drawdowns

CE31.L vs. GILS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CE31.L drawdown since its inception was -18.33%, smaller than the maximum GILS.L drawdown of -38.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CE31.L and GILS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CE31.LGILS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.33%

-38.75%

+20.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.62%

-6.23%

+3.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.05%

-9.33%

+6.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.98%

-34.64%

+28.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.14%

-38.75%

+25.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.78%

-35.86%

+32.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.24%

-12.02%

+4.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

2.78%

-1.61%

Volatility

CE31.L vs. GILS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Euro Government Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (CE31.L) is 1.27%, while Lyxor Core UK Government Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (GILS.L) has a volatility of 2.44%. This indicates that CE31.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GILS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CE31.LGILS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.27%

2.44%

-1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.87%

5.64%

-2.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.18%

6.67%

-2.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.29%

10.11%

-4.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.07%

9.06%

-1.99%

CE31.L vs. GILS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CE31.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than GILS.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CE31.L vs. GILS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CE31.L nor GILS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CE31.L
iShares Euro Government Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GILS.L
Lyxor Core UK Government Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.02%0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


CE31.L and GILS.L have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GILS.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GILS.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for CE31.L.

CE31.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Agg Govt 1-3 Yr TR EUR, while GILS.L tracks FTSE Actuaries UK Conventional Gilts All Stocks. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Lyxor. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CE31.L and 0.05% for GILS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CE31.L and GILS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer