CE2D.L vs. NASD.L
CE2D.L (Amundi Index MSCI Europe UCITS ETF DR EUR (D)) and NASD.L (Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD) are both exchange-traded funds - CE2D.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe NR EUR, while NASD.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CE2D.L returned 10.25%/yr vs 17.13%/yr for NASD.L. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CE2D.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for NASD.L.
Performance
CE2D.L vs. NASD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CE2D.L is traded in GBp, while NASD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NASD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CE2D.L achieves a 9.28% return, which is significantly lower than NASD.L's 17.96% return.
CE2D.L
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- YTD
- 9.28%
- 6M
- 9.76%
- 1Y
- 23.59%
- 3Y*
- 15.40%
- 5Y*
- 10.25%
- 10Y*
- —
NASD.L
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- -0.14%
- YTD
- 17.96%
- 6M
- 17.51%
- 1Y
- 37.07%
- 3Y*
- 24.56%
- 5Y*
- 17.13%
- 10Y*
- 23.19%
CE2D.L vs. NASD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CE2D.L Amundi Index MSCI Europe UCITS ETF DR EUR (D) | 9.28% | 25.78% | 3.75% | 13.16% | -3.54% | 17.17% | 2.21% | 19.65% | -2.69% |
NASD.L Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD | 17.96% | 11.32% | 29.04% | 48.58% | -25.47% | 29.46% | 44.11% | 52.29% | -3.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between CE2D.L and NASD.L is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2018 | 0.56 |
The correlation between CE2D.L and NASD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
CE2D.L vs. NASD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CE2D.L
NASD.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
CE2D.L
NASD.L
Industrials
CE2D.L
NASD.L
Healthcare
CE2D.L
NASD.L
Technology
CE2D.L
NASD.L
Consumer Defensive
CE2D.L
NASD.L
Consumer Cyclical
CE2D.L
NASD.L
Energy
CE2D.L
NASD.L
Basic Materials
CE2D.L
NASD.L
Utilities
CE2D.L
NASD.L
Communication Services
CE2D.L
NASD.L
Real Estate
CE2D.L
NASD.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CE2D.L vs. NASD.L — Risk / Return Rank
CE2D.L
NASD.L
CE2D.L vs. NASD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index MSCI Europe UCITS ETF DR EUR (D) (CE2D.L) and Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD (NASD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CE2D.L | NASD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.39 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.24 | 3.34 | -1.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.94 | 9.32 | -1.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CE2D.L vs. NASD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CE2D.L drawdown since its inception was -28.51%, roughly equal to the maximum NASD.L drawdown of -27.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CE2D.L and NASD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CE2D.L | NASD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.51% | -27.57% | -0.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.48% | -11.03% | +0.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.91% | -24.53% | +11.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.74% | -27.57% | +11.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -3.23% | +3.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.86% | -6.10% | +2.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.96% | 3.97% | -1.01% |
Volatility
CE2D.L vs. NASD.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi Index MSCI Europe UCITS ETF DR EUR (D) (CE2D.L) is 2.89%, while Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD (NASD.L) has a volatility of 6.66%. This indicates that CE2D.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NASD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CE2D.L | NASD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.89% | 6.66% | -3.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.28% | 12.91% | -2.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.14% | 16.81% | -4.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.82% | 20.89% | -7.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.51% | 22.01% | -6.50% |
CE2D.L vs. NASD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CE2D.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than NASD.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
CE2D.L vs. NASD.L - Dividend Comparison
CE2D.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, while NASD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CE2D.L Amundi Index MSCI Europe UCITS ETF DR EUR (D) | 2.31% | 2.52% | 2.79% | 2.74% | 2.96% | 2.20% | 2.07% | 3.22% | 3.11% | 0.00% |
NASD.L Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.66% | 0.69% | 0.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CE2D.L and NASD.L have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CE2D.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CE2D.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for NASD.L.
CE2D.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while NASD.L is Nasdaq-100. CE2D.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while NASD.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CE2D.L and 0.30% for NASD.L.
Find the right allocation for CE2D.L and NASD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer