PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CE2D.L vs. FLXD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CE2D.L vs. FLXD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi Index MSCI Europe UCITS ETF DR EUR (D) (CE2D.L) and Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CE2D.L is traded in GBp, while FLXD.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the FLXD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CE2D.L achieves a 6.08% return, which is significantly lower than FLXD.L's 8.75% return.


CE2D.L

1D
-0.59%
1M
2.34%
YTD
6.08%
6M
8.48%
1Y
19.17%
3Y*
14.11%
5Y*
9.93%
10Y*

FLXD.L

1D
-0.27%
1M
-1.11%
YTD
8.75%
6M
12.23%
1Y
20.28%
3Y*
19.04%
5Y*
13.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CE2D.L vs. FLXD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CE2D.L
Amundi Index MSCI Europe UCITS ETF DR EUR (D)
6.08%25.78%3.75%14.43%-4.94%18.18%
FLXD.L
Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF
8.75%31.50%8.51%9.23%6.26%11.31%

Correlation

The correlation between CE2D.L and FLXD.L is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2021

0.40

The correlation between CE2D.L and FLXD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (all time) to 0.57 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CE2D.L vs. FLXD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CE2D.L
FLXD.L

Financial Services

23.5%
35.8%

Industrials

20.1%
7.9%

Healthcare

13.3%
10.3%

Technology

8.7%
0.7%

Consumer Defensive

8.3%
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

6.4%
1.0%

Energy

5.4%
11.6%

Basic Materials

5.0%
5.2%

Utilities

4.8%
3.1%

Communication Services

3.7%
16.3%

Real Estate

0.8%
3.5%

Financial Services

CE2D.L
23.5%
FLXD.L
35.8%

Industrials

CE2D.L
20.1%
FLXD.L
7.9%

Healthcare

CE2D.L
13.3%
FLXD.L
10.3%

Technology

CE2D.L
8.7%
FLXD.L
0.7%

Consumer Defensive

CE2D.L
8.3%
FLXD.L
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

CE2D.L
6.4%
FLXD.L
1.0%

Energy

CE2D.L
5.4%
FLXD.L
11.6%

Basic Materials

CE2D.L
5.0%
FLXD.L
5.2%

Utilities

CE2D.L
4.8%
FLXD.L
3.1%

Communication Services

CE2D.L
3.7%
FLXD.L
16.3%

Real Estate

CE2D.L
0.8%
FLXD.L
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CE2D.L vs. FLXD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CE2D.L
CE2D.L Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
CE2D.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CE2D.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
CE2D.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
CE2D.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
CE2D.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

FLXD.L
FLXD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FLXD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLXD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLXD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FLXD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLXD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CE2D.L vs. FLXD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index MSCI Europe UCITS ETF DR EUR (D) (CE2D.L) and Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CE2D.LFLXD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.43

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

5.58

-3.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.46

15.69

-9.23

CE2D.L vs. FLXD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CE2D.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is lower than the FLXD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CE2D.L and FLXD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CE2D.LFLXD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.58

2.37

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

1.20

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.13

0.63

+0.50

Drawdowns

CE2D.L vs. FLXD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CE2D.L drawdown since its inception was -15.74%, smaller than the maximum FLXD.L drawdown of -29.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CE2D.L and FLXD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CE2D.LFLXD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.74%

-29.71%

+13.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.48%

-3.62%

-6.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.91%

-7.78%

-5.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.74%

-11.76%

-3.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.95%

-3.24%

+1.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.73%

-4.13%

+1.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

1.29%

+1.68%

Volatility

CE2D.L vs. FLXD.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Index MSCI Europe UCITS ETF DR EUR (D) (CE2D.L) has a higher volatility of 4.10% compared to Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.L) at 2.68%. This indicates that CE2D.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLXD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CE2D.LFLXD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.10%

2.68%

+1.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.14%

6.94%

+3.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.10%

8.54%

+3.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.44%

10.85%

+6.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.62%

12.92%

+4.70%

CE2D.L vs. FLXD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CE2D.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FLXD.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CE2D.L vs. FLXD.L - Dividend Comparison

CE2D.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, less than FLXD.L's 4.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CE2D.L
Amundi Index MSCI Europe UCITS ETF DR EUR (D)
2.38%2.52%2.79%2.74%3.00%2.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FLXD.L
Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF
4.39%4.90%5.18%5.75%5.87%5.51%3.90%1.53%1.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


CE2D.L and FLXD.L have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CE2D.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CE2D.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FLXD.L.

CE2D.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while FLXD.L tracks MSCI Europe High Div Yld NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CE2D.L and 0.25% for FLXD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CE2D.L and FLXD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer