CDX vs. PYLD
CDX (Simplify High Yield ETF) and PYLD (PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - CDX is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by Simplify, while PYLD is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by PIMCO. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CDX returned 7.14%/yr vs 7.64%/yr for PYLD. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CDX charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PYLD.
Performance
CDX vs. PYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CDX achieves a -2.68% return, which is significantly lower than PYLD's 1.13% return.
CDX
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -1.14%
- 6M
- -2.81%
- YTD
- -2.68%
- 1Y
- -1.92%
- 3Y*
- 7.14%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PYLD
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- 6M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 1.13%
- 1Y
- 6.10%
- 3Y*
- 7.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CDX vs. PYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CDX Simplify High Yield ETF | -2.68% | 9.51% | 7.71% | 7.99% |
PYLD PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 1.13% | 9.57% | 7.69% | 5.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between CDX and PYLD is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2023 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CDX vs. PYLD — Risk / Return Rank
CDX
PYLD
CDX vs. PYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify High Yield ETF (CDX) and PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CDX | PYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.39 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.46 | 1.89 | -2.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.96 | 8.53 | -9.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CDX vs. PYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CDX drawdown since its inception was -13.24%, which is greater than PYLD's maximum drawdown of -4.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDX and PYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CDX | PYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.24% | -4.52% | -8.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.18% | -3.25% | -0.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.88% | -4.50% | -4.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.63% | -0.83% | -6.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.39% | -0.64% | -3.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.02% | 0.72% | +1.30% |
Volatility
CDX vs. PYLD - Volatility Comparison
Simplify High Yield ETF (CDX) has a higher volatility of 1.79% compared to PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD) at 1.08%. This indicates that CDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CDX | PYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.79% | 1.08% | +0.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.98% | 2.65% | +2.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.83% | 3.07% | +2.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.01% | 3.97% | +7.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.01% | 3.97% | +7.04% |
CDX vs. PYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
CDX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than PYLD's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
CDX vs. PYLD - Dividend Comparison
CDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.35%, more than PYLD's 6.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDX Simplify High Yield ETF | 8.35% | 7.18% | 12.60% | 5.26% | 7.51% |
PYLD PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 6.35% | 6.21% | 6.40% | 2.72% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CDX and PYLD have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CDX has higher volatility (1.79%) compared to PYLD (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDX dropped -13.24% vs PYLD's -4.52%.
On 3-year performance, PYLD leads with 7.64% vs 7.14% for CDX. On fees, CDX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, PYLD has been the lower-risk option at 1.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PYLD has performed better with a 7.64% return vs 7.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CDX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PYLD.
CDX has the higher dividend yield at 8.35%, compared with 6.35% for PYLD.
CDX is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while PYLD is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CDX and 0.55% for PYLD.
PYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CDX and PYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer