PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CDX vs. LDRH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CDX vs. LDRH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF (CDX) and iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDX achieves a -2.44% return, which is significantly lower than LDRH's 1.79% return.


CDX

1D
-0.19%
1M
-0.71%
YTD
-2.44%
6M
-2.70%
1Y
-1.77%
3Y*
7.17%
5Y*
10Y*

LDRH

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.18%
YTD
1.79%
6M
2.28%
1Y
6.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CDX vs. LDRH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CDX and LDRH is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2024

0.47

CDX vs. LDRH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CDX
LDRH

Technology

24.6%

-

Industrials

15.1%

-

Healthcare

14.2%

-

Financial Services

10.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%

-

Energy

6.9%
100.0%

Real Estate

4.2%

-

Communication Services

4.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.1%

-

Basic Materials

4.0%

-

Utilities

2.9%

-

Technology

CDX
24.6%
LDRH

-

Industrials

CDX
15.1%
LDRH

-

Healthcare

CDX
14.2%
LDRH

-

Financial Services

CDX
10.0%
LDRH

-

Consumer Cyclical

CDX
9.8%
LDRH

-

Energy

CDX
6.9%
LDRH
100.0%

Real Estate

CDX
4.2%
LDRH

-

Communication Services

CDX
4.1%
LDRH

-

Consumer Defensive

CDX
4.1%
LDRH

-

Basic Materials

CDX
4.0%
LDRH

-

Utilities

CDX
2.9%
LDRH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CDX vs. LDRH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDX
CDX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
CDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
CDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

LDRH
LDRH Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
LDRH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDRH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDRH Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
LDRH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDRH Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDX vs. LDRH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF (CDX) and iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CDXLDRHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.49

-0.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.43

5.24

-5.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.00

21.81

-22.82

CDX vs. LDRH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDX Sharpe Ratio is -0.31, which is lower than the LDRH Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDX and LDRH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CDXLDRHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.31

2.48

-2.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

1.69

-1.31

Drawdowns

CDX vs. LDRH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDX drawdown since its inception was -13.24%, which is greater than LDRH's maximum drawdown of -3.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDX and LDRH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CDXLDRHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.24%

-3.17%

-10.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.18%

-1.23%

-2.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.41%

-0.20%

-7.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.34%

-0.24%

-4.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.77%

0.30%

+1.47%

Volatility

CDX vs. LDRH - Volatility Comparison

Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF (CDX) has a higher volatility of 1.61% compared to iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH) at 0.69%. This indicates that CDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDRH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CDXLDRHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.61%

0.69%

+0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.72%

1.97%

+2.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.69%

2.61%

+3.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.10%

3.52%

+7.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.10%

3.52%

+7.58%

CDX vs. LDRH - Expense Ratio Comparison

CDX has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than LDRH's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

CDX vs. LDRH - Dividend Comparison

CDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.37%, more than LDRH's 7.00% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CDX
Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF
8.37%7.18%12.60%5.26%7.51%
LDRH
iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF
7.00%6.41%1.13%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CDX and LDRH have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CDX has higher volatility (1.61%) compared to LDRH (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDX dropped -13.24% vs LDRH's -3.17%.

On 1-year performance, LDRH leads with 6.43% vs -1.77% for CDX. On fees, CDX is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, LDRH has been the lower-risk option at 0.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, LDRH has performed better with a 6.43% return vs -1.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CDX is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for LDRH.

CDX has the higher dividend yield at 8.37%, compared with 7.00% for LDRH.

They also come from different issuers: Simplify and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for CDX and 0.35% for LDRH.

LDRH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CDX and LDRH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer