CDX vs. LDRH
CDX (Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF) and LDRH (iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. CDX is actively managed, while LDRH is passively managed. Over the past year, CDX returned -1.77% vs 6.43% for LDRH. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CDX charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for LDRH.
Performance
CDX vs. LDRH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CDX achieves a -2.44% return, which is significantly lower than LDRH's 1.79% return.
CDX
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -0.71%
- YTD
- -2.44%
- 6M
- -2.70%
- 1Y
- -1.77%
- 3Y*
- 7.17%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LDRH
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 1.79%
- 6M
- 2.28%
- 1Y
- 6.43%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CDX vs. LDRH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CDX Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF | -2.44% | 9.51% | -2.36% |
LDRH iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF | 1.79% | 7.18% | 0.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between CDX and LDRH is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2024 | 0.47 |
CDX vs. LDRH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CDX
LDRH
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Technology
CDX
LDRH
-
Industrials
CDX
LDRH
-
Healthcare
CDX
LDRH
-
Financial Services
CDX
LDRH
-
Consumer Cyclical
CDX
LDRH
-
Energy
CDX
LDRH
Real Estate
CDX
LDRH
-
Communication Services
CDX
LDRH
-
Consumer Defensive
CDX
LDRH
-
Basic Materials
CDX
LDRH
-
Utilities
CDX
LDRH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CDX vs. LDRH — Risk / Return Rank
CDX
LDRH
CDX vs. LDRH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF (CDX) and iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CDX | LDRH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.49 | -0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | 5.24 | -5.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.00 | 21.81 | -22.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CDX | LDRH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.31 | 2.48 | -2.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 1.69 | -1.31 |
Drawdowns
CDX vs. LDRH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CDX drawdown since its inception was -13.24%, which is greater than LDRH's maximum drawdown of -3.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDX and LDRH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CDX | LDRH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.24% | -3.17% | -10.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.18% | -1.23% | -2.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.41% | -0.20% | -7.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.34% | -0.24% | -4.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.77% | 0.30% | +1.47% |
Volatility
CDX vs. LDRH - Volatility Comparison
Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF (CDX) has a higher volatility of 1.61% compared to iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH) at 0.69%. This indicates that CDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDRH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CDX | LDRH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.61% | 0.69% | +0.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.72% | 1.97% | +2.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.69% | 2.61% | +3.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.10% | 3.52% | +7.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.10% | 3.52% | +7.58% |
CDX vs. LDRH - Expense Ratio Comparison
CDX has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than LDRH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
CDX vs. LDRH - Dividend Comparison
CDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.37%, more than LDRH's 7.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDX Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF | 8.37% | 7.18% | 12.60% | 5.26% | 7.51% |
LDRH iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF | 7.00% | 6.41% | 1.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CDX and LDRH have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CDX has higher volatility (1.61%) compared to LDRH (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDX dropped -13.24% vs LDRH's -3.17%.
On 1-year performance, LDRH leads with 6.43% vs -1.77% for CDX. On fees, CDX is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, LDRH has been the lower-risk option at 0.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, LDRH has performed better with a 6.43% return vs -1.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CDX is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for LDRH.
CDX has the higher dividend yield at 8.37%, compared with 7.00% for LDRH.
They also come from different issuers: Simplify and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for CDX and 0.35% for LDRH.
LDRH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CDX and LDRH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer