CDX vs. BILZ
CDX (Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF) and BILZ (PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - CDX is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by Simplify, while BILZ is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PIMCO. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CDX returned -1.77% vs 3.91% for BILZ. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. CDX charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for BILZ.
Performance
CDX vs. BILZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CDX achieves a -2.44% return, which is significantly lower than BILZ's 1.47% return.
CDX
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -0.71%
- YTD
- -2.44%
- 6M
- -2.70%
- 1Y
- -1.77%
- 3Y*
- 7.17%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BILZ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.47%
- 6M
- 1.76%
- 1Y
- 3.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CDX vs. BILZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CDX Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF | -2.44% | 9.51% | 7.71% | 8.24% |
BILZ PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 1.47% | 4.21% | 5.25% | 2.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between CDX and BILZ is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2023 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CDX vs. BILZ — Risk / Return Rank
CDX
BILZ
CDX vs. BILZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF (CDX) and PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund (BILZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CDX | BILZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -19.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -125.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 53.31 | -52.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | 198.55 | -198.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.00 | 2,000.92 | -2,001.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CDX | BILZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.31 | 19.09 | -19.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 10.48 | -10.10 |
Drawdowns
CDX vs. BILZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CDX drawdown since its inception was -13.24%, which is greater than BILZ's maximum drawdown of -0.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDX and BILZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CDX | BILZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.24% | -0.52% | -12.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.18% | -0.02% | -4.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.41% | 0.00% | -7.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.34% | -0.01% | -4.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.77% | 0.00% | +1.77% |
Volatility
CDX vs. BILZ - Volatility Comparison
Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF (CDX) has a higher volatility of 1.61% compared to PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund (BILZ) at 0.07%. This indicates that CDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BILZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CDX | BILZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.61% | 0.07% | +1.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.72% | 0.14% | +4.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.69% | 0.21% | +5.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.10% | 0.43% | +10.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.10% | 0.43% | +10.67% |
CDX vs. BILZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
CDX has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than BILZ's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CDX vs. BILZ - Dividend Comparison
CDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.37%, more than BILZ's 4.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BILZ PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 4.07% | 4.19% | 4.95% | 2.23% | 0.00% |
CDX Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF | 8.37% | 7.18% | 12.60% | 5.26% | 7.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CDX and BILZ have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CDX has higher volatility (1.61%) compared to BILZ (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDX dropped -13.24% vs BILZ's -0.52%.
On 1-year performance, BILZ leads with 3.91% vs -1.77% for CDX. On fees, BILZ is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, BILZ has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BILZ has performed better with a 3.91% return vs -1.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BILZ is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for CDX.
CDX has the higher dividend yield at 8.37%, compared with 4.07% for BILZ.
CDX is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while BILZ is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for CDX and 0.14% for BILZ.
BILZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.09 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CDX and BILZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer