PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CDW vs. MCHP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CDW vs. MCHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CDW Corporation (CDW) and Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDW achieves a -1.88% return, which is significantly lower than MCHP's 51.10% return. Over the past 10 years, CDW has underperformed MCHP with an annualized return of 13.42%, while MCHP has yielded a comparatively higher 15.99% annualized return.


CDW

1D
2.37%
1M
30.28%
YTD
-1.88%
6M
-7.79%
1Y
-20.93%
3Y*
-7.68%
5Y*
-3.49%
10Y*
13.42%

MCHP

1D
2.47%
1M
1.99%
YTD
51.10%
6M
43.32%
1Y
48.83%
3Y*
6.19%
5Y*
6.57%
10Y*
15.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CDW vs. MCHP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CDW
CDW Corporation
-1.88%-20.56%-22.57%28.84%-11.75%56.87%-6.55%78.22%17.98%34.92%
MCHP
Microchip Technology Incorporated
51.10%14.61%-34.96%30.90%-17.98%27.49%33.73%48.02%-16.71%39.46%

Correlation

The correlation between CDW and MCHP is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2013

0.52

The correlation between CDW and MCHP shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.56 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

CDW:

$8.22

MCHP:

$0.43

PE Ratio

CDW:

16.09

MCHP:

221.70

PEG Ratio

CDW:

4.57

MCHP:

3.34

PS Ratio

CDW:

0.76

MCHP:

8.20

Total Revenue (TTM)

CDW:

$22.90B

MCHP:

$4.71B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CDW:

$4.94B

MCHP:

$2.72B

EBITDA (TTM)

CDW:

$1.89B

MCHP:

$1.02B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CDW vs. MCHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDW
CDW Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
CDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDW Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
CDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDW Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

MCHP
MCHP Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
MCHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCHP Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
MCHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCHP Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDW vs. MCHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CDW Corporation (CDW) and Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CDWMCHPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.20

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.51

1.28

-1.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.99

3.40

-4.38

CDW vs. MCHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDW Sharpe Ratio is -0.57, which is lower than the MCHP Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDW and MCHP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CDW vs. MCHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDW drawdown since its inception was -60.37%, smaller than the maximum MCHP drawdown of -63.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDW and MCHP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CDWMCHPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.37%

-63.77%

+3.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.97%

-34.41%

-10.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.37%

-63.77%

+3.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.37%

-63.77%

+3.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.37%

-63.77%

+3.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.93%

-7.00%

-39.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.99%

-16.71%

+5.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.22%

12.99%

+10.23%

Volatility

CDW vs. MCHP - Volatility Comparison

CDW Corporation (CDW) and Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP) have volatilities of 16.66% and 16.18%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CDWMCHPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.66%

16.18%

+0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.93%

32.33%

+3.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.26%

44.05%

-3.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.99%

44.17%

-13.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.95%

41.91%

-10.96%

Dividends

CDW vs. MCHP - Dividend Comparison

CDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, which matches MCHP's 1.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CDW
CDW Corporation
1.90%1.84%1.43%1.05%1.17%0.83%1.17%0.89%1.14%0.99%0.93%0.74%
MCHP
Microchip Technology Incorporated
1.91%2.86%3.16%1.76%1.65%0.98%1.07%1.40%2.02%1.65%2.24%3.07%

Financials

CDW vs. MCHP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CDW Corporation and Microchip Technology Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
5.68B
1.31B
(CDW) Total Revenue
(MCHP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CDW vs. MCHP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CDW Corporation and Microchip Technology Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
21.0%
73.8%
Portfolio components
CDW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CDW Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.19B and revenue of 5.68B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.0%.

MCHP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microchip Technology Incorporated reported a gross profit of 967.30M and revenue of 1.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.8%.

CDW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CDW Corporation reported an operating income of 376.00M and revenue of 5.68B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.6%.

MCHP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microchip Technology Incorporated reported an operating income of 211.10M and revenue of 1.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.1%.

CDW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CDW Corporation reported a net income of 235.40M and revenue of 5.68B, resulting in a net margin of 4.1%.

MCHP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microchip Technology Incorporated reported a net income of 116.40M and revenue of 1.31B, resulting in a net margin of 8.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CDW and MCHP have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CDW has higher volatility (16.66%) compared to MCHP (16.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDW dropped -60.37% vs MCHP's -63.77%.

MCHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CDW and MCHP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer