CDSRX vs. QS
CDSRX (Calvert Short Duration Income Fund Class R6) is Short-Term Bond fund managed by Calvert, while QS (QuantumScape Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, CDSRX returned 2.74%/yr vs -25.61%/yr for QS. Their 0.15 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CDSRX vs. QS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CDSRX achieves a 0.69% return, which is significantly higher than QS's -49.90% return.
CDSRX
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -0.38%
- 6M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 0.69%
- 1Y
- 3.01%
- 3Y*
- 5.45%
- 5Y*
- 2.74%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.34%
QS
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -26.17%
- 6M
- -41.02%
- YTD
- -49.90%
- 1Y
- -36.80%
- 3Y*
- -25.29%
- 5Y*
- -25.61%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -24.02%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $177.64M | $171.31M | $186.89M |
CDSRX vs. QS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDSRX Calvert Short Duration Income Fund Class R6 | 0.69% | 6.35% | 5.74% | 6.87% | -5.07% | 1.20% | 0.96% |
QS QuantumScape Corporation | -49.90% | 100.77% | -25.32% | 22.57% | -74.45% | -73.72% | 240.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between CDSRX and QS is 0.18, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 27, 2020 | 0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CDSRX vs. QS — Risk / Return Rank
CDSRX
QS
CDSRX vs. QS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Short Duration Income Fund Class R6 (CDSRX) and QuantumScape Corporation (QS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CDSRX | QS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 0.97 | +0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | -0.54 | +3.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.47 | -0.84 | +10.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CDSRX vs. QS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CDSRX drawdown since its inception was -9.96%, smaller than the maximum QS drawdown of -97.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDSRX and QS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CDSRX | QS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.96% | -97.36% | +87.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.56% | -73.51% | +71.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.56% | -73.51% | +71.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.91% | -91.45% | +83.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | -96.04% | +95.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.35% | -88.92% | +87.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.41% | 47.08% | -46.67% |
Volatility
CDSRX vs. QS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Calvert Short Duration Income Fund Class R6 (CDSRX) is 0.46%, while QuantumScape Corporation (QS) has a volatility of 22.61%. This indicates that CDSRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CDSRX | QS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.46% | 22.61% | -22.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.64% | 53.79% | -52.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.11% | 85.67% | -83.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.44% | 86.23% | -83.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.64% | 97.93% | -95.29% |
Dividends
CDSRX vs. QS - Dividend Comparison
CDSRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.27%, while QS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDSRX Calvert Short Duration Income Fund Class R6 | 4.27% | 4.55% | 4.98% | 3.52% | 2.21% | 2.56% | 2.88% | 2.75% |
QS QuantumScape Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CDSRX and QS have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QS has higher volatility (22.61%) compared to CDSRX (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDSRX dropped -9.96% vs QS's -97.36%.
CDSRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs -0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CDSRX and QS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer