CDSRX vs. DBLSX
CDSRX (Calvert Short Duration Income Fund Class R6) and DBLSX (DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund) are both Short-Term Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, CDSRX returned 2.85%/yr vs 3.17%/yr for DBLSX. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CDSRX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for DBLSX.
Performance
CDSRX vs. DBLSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CDSRX achieves a 0.82% return, which is significantly lower than DBLSX's 1.06% return.
CDSRX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 0.82%
- 6M
- 1.22%
- 1Y
- 4.82%
- 3Y*
- 5.80%
- 5Y*
- 2.85%
- 10Y*
- —
DBLSX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 1.06%
- 6M
- 1.37%
- 1Y
- 4.51%
- 3Y*
- 5.51%
- 5Y*
- 3.17%
- 10Y*
- 2.87%
CDSRX vs. DBLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDSRX Calvert Short Duration Income Fund Class R6 | 0.82% | 6.35% | 5.74% | 6.87% | -5.07% | 1.20% | 4.82% | 4.87% |
DBLSX DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund | 1.06% | 5.74% | 5.32% | 6.76% | -2.69% | 0.70% | 2.02% | 3.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between CDSRX and DBLSX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2019 | 0.66 |
The correlation between CDSRX and DBLSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CDSRX vs. DBLSX — Risk / Return Rank
CDSRX
DBLSX
CDSRX vs. DBLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Short Duration Income Fund Class R6 (CDSRX) and DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund (DBLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CDSRX | DBLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 2.06 | -0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.10 | 6.27 | -3.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.37 | 28.69 | -16.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CDSRX | DBLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | 3.76 | -1.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.19 | 2.28 | -1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.29 | 0.05 | +1.24 |
Drawdowns
CDSRX vs. DBLSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CDSRX drawdown since its inception was -9.96%, smaller than the maximum DBLSX drawdown of -57.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDSRX and DBLSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CDSRX | DBLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.96% | -57.22% | +47.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.56% | -0.72% | -0.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.56% | -0.72% | -0.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.91% | -4.71% | -3.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | -45.00% | +44.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.37% | -31.51% | +30.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.39% | 0.16% | +0.23% |
Volatility
CDSRX vs. DBLSX - Volatility Comparison
Calvert Short Duration Income Fund Class R6 (CDSRX) has a higher volatility of 0.67% compared to DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund (DBLSX) at 0.42%. This indicates that CDSRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CDSRX | DBLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.67% | 0.42% | +0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.54% | 0.89% | +0.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10% | 1.20% | +0.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.42% | 1.39% | +1.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.66% | 63.99% | -61.33% |
CDSRX vs. DBLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CDSRX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than DBLSX's 0.41% expense ratio.
Dividends
CDSRX vs. DBLSX - Dividend Comparison
CDSRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, more than DBLSX's 4.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDSRX Calvert Short Duration Income Fund Class R6 | 4.67% | 4.55% | 4.98% | 3.52% | 2.21% | 2.56% | 2.88% | 2.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DBLSX DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund | 4.55% | 4.64% | 5.09% | 4.49% | 2.50% | 1.72% | 2.37% | 3.21% | 2.92% | 2.42% | 2.52% | 2.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CDSRX and DBLSX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CDSRX has higher volatility (0.67%) compared to DBLSX (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDSRX dropped -9.96% vs DBLSX's -57.22%.
DBLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.76 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CDSRX and DBLSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer