CDOT.DE vs. RAND.DE
CDOT.DE (CoinShares Physical Staked Polkadot EUR ETP) and RAND.DE (CoinShares Physical Staked Algorand EUR) are both Cryptocurrency funds from CoinShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CDOT.DE returned -39.90%/yr vs -11.13%/yr for RAND.DE. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.00% expense ratio.
Performance
CDOT.DE vs. RAND.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CDOT.DE achieves a -40.09% return, which is significantly lower than RAND.DE's -18.89% return.
CDOT.DE
- 1D
- -4.83%
- 1M
- -15.78%
- YTD
- -40.09%
- 6M
- -53.26%
- 1Y
- -73.47%
- 3Y*
- -39.90%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RAND.DE
- 1D
- -5.09%
- 1M
- -10.36%
- YTD
- -18.89%
- 6M
- -25.03%
- 1Y
- -46.62%
- 3Y*
- -11.13%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CDOT.DE vs. RAND.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDOT.DE CoinShares Physical Staked Polkadot EUR ETP | -40.09% | -75.15% | -10.53% | 101.17% | -39.60% |
RAND.DE CoinShares Physical Staked Algorand EUR | -18.89% | -63.34% | 46.73% | 44.34% | -52.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between CDOT.DE and RAND.DE is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2022 | 0.76 |
The correlation between CDOT.DE and RAND.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CDOT.DE vs. RAND.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CDOT.DE
RAND.DE
CDOT.DE vs. RAND.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares Physical Staked Polkadot EUR ETP (CDOT.DE) and CoinShares Physical Staked Algorand EUR (RAND.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CDOT.DE | RAND.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 0.97 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.97 | -0.63 | -0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.49 | -0.93 | -0.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CDOT.DE | RAND.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.01 | -0.49 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.60 | -0.28 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
CDOT.DE vs. RAND.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CDOT.DE drawdown since its inception was -94.66%, which is greater than RAND.DE's maximum drawdown of -86.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDOT.DE and RAND.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CDOT.DE | RAND.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.66% | -86.60% | -8.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -75.82% | -72.75% | -3.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -90.64% | -86.60% | -4.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.66% | -82.79% | -11.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -70.87% | -60.08% | -10.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 49.28% | 49.62% | -0.34% |
Volatility
CDOT.DE vs. RAND.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CoinShares Physical Staked Polkadot EUR ETP (CDOT.DE) is 16.86%, while CoinShares Physical Staked Algorand EUR (RAND.DE) has a volatility of 20.37%. This indicates that CDOT.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RAND.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CDOT.DE | RAND.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.86% | 20.37% | -3.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.99% | 51.93% | +0.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.57% | 93.35% | -20.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 77.58% | 92.49% | -14.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 77.58% | 92.49% | -14.91% |
CDOT.DE vs. RAND.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CDOT.DE has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than RAND.DE's 0.00% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CDOT.DE vs. RAND.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CDOT.DE nor RAND.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CDOT.DE and RAND.DE have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.00% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CDOT.DE and RAND.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.00% per year.
Find the right allocation for CDOT.DE and RAND.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer