RAND.DE vs. CTEN.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about CoinShares Physical Staked Algorand EUR (RAND.DE) and CoinShares Physical Top10 Crypto Market ETP (CTEN.DE).
RAND.DE and CTEN.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RAND.DE is an actively managed fund by CoinShares. It was launched on Jul 14, 2022. CTEN.DE is an actively managed fund by CoinShares. It was launched on Mar 27, 2023.
Performance
RAND.DE vs. CTEN.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RAND.DE vs. CTEN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RAND.DE CoinShares Physical Staked Algorand EUR | -17.13% | -63.34% | 46.73% | 19.87% |
CTEN.DE CoinShares Physical Top10 Crypto Market ETP | -24.02% | -19.43% | 96.51% | 53.65% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RAND.DE achieves a -17.13% return, which is significantly higher than CTEN.DE's -24.02% return.
RAND.DE
- 1D
- 19.53%
- 1M
- 21.31%
- YTD
- -17.13%
- 6M
- -49.91%
- 1Y
- -47.19%
- 3Y*
- -22.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CTEN.DE
- 1D
- 2.22%
- 1M
- 0.84%
- YTD
- -24.02%
- 6M
- -48.29%
- 1Y
- -18.92%
- 3Y*
- 20.12%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RAND.DE vs. CTEN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
RAND.DE has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than CTEN.DE's 0.00% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
RAND.DE vs. CTEN.DE — Risk / Return Rank
RAND.DE
CTEN.DE
RAND.DE vs. CTEN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares Physical Staked Algorand EUR (RAND.DE) and CoinShares Physical Top10 Crypto Market ETP (CTEN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RAND.DE | CTEN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.47 | -0.36 | -0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.23 | -0.20 | -0.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 0.98 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.53 | -0.35 | -0.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.89 | -0.72 | -0.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RAND.DE | CTEN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.47 | -0.36 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.29 | 0.42 | -0.71 |
Correlation
The correlation between RAND.DE and CTEN.DE is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RAND.DE vs. CTEN.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither RAND.DE nor CTEN.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
RAND.DE vs. CTEN.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RAND.DE drawdown since its inception was -86.60%, which is greater than CTEN.DE's maximum drawdown of -56.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAND.DE and CTEN.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RAND.DE | CTEN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.60% | -56.27% | -30.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.75% | -56.27% | -16.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -82.42% | -51.52% | -30.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -59.06% | -17.41% | -41.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.20% | 27.19% | +16.01% |
Volatility
RAND.DE vs. CTEN.DE - Volatility Comparison
CoinShares Physical Staked Algorand EUR (RAND.DE) has a higher volatility of 24.86% compared to CoinShares Physical Top10 Crypto Market ETP (CTEN.DE) at 14.56%. This indicates that RAND.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CTEN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RAND.DE | CTEN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.86% | 14.56% | +10.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 67.03% | 38.70% | +28.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 98.91% | 52.26% | +46.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 93.48% | 52.81% | +40.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 93.48% | 52.81% | +40.67% |