CDOT.DE vs. IBLC
CDOT.DE (CoinShares Physical Staked Polkadot EUR ETP) and IBLC (iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. CDOT.DE is actively managed, while IBLC is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CDOT.DE returned -39.90%/yr vs 46.12%/yr for IBLC. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CDOT.DE charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for IBLC.
Performance
CDOT.DE vs. IBLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CDOT.DE is traded in EUR, while IBLC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IBLC values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CDOT.DE achieves a -40.09% return, which is significantly lower than IBLC's 32.49% return.
CDOT.DE
- 1D
- -4.83%
- 1M
- -15.78%
- YTD
- -40.09%
- 6M
- -53.26%
- 1Y
- -73.47%
- 3Y*
- -39.90%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBLC
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- 9.07%
- YTD
- 32.49%
- 6M
- 11.75%
- 1Y
- 62.06%
- 3Y*
- 46.12%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CDOT.DE vs. IBLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDOT.DE CoinShares Physical Staked Polkadot EUR ETP | -40.09% | -75.15% | -10.53% | 101.17% | -74.21% |
IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF | 32.49% | 11.97% | 26.41% | 192.43% | -58.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between CDOT.DE and IBLC is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2022 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CDOT.DE vs. IBLC — Risk / Return Rank
CDOT.DE
IBLC
CDOT.DE vs. IBLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares Physical Staked Polkadot EUR ETP (CDOT.DE) and iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CDOT.DE | IBLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 1.20 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.97 | 1.37 | -2.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.49 | 2.74 | -4.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CDOT.DE | IBLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.01 | 1.15 | -2.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.60 | 0.35 | -0.95 |
Drawdowns
CDOT.DE vs. IBLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CDOT.DE drawdown since its inception was -94.66%, which is greater than IBLC's maximum drawdown of -62.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDOT.DE and IBLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CDOT.DE | IBLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.66% | -62.50% | -32.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -75.82% | -45.56% | -30.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -90.64% | -53.40% | -37.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.66% | -13.63% | -81.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -70.87% | -26.18% | -44.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 49.28% | 22.73% | +26.55% |
Volatility
CDOT.DE vs. IBLC - Volatility Comparison
CoinShares Physical Staked Polkadot EUR ETP (CDOT.DE) has a higher volatility of 16.86% compared to iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC) at 13.76%. This indicates that CDOT.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CDOT.DE | IBLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.86% | 13.76% | +3.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.99% | 39.74% | +12.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.57% | 54.28% | +18.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 77.58% | 63.18% | +14.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 77.58% | 63.18% | +14.40% |
CDOT.DE vs. IBLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
CDOT.DE has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than IBLC's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
CDOT.DE vs. IBLC - Dividend Comparison
CDOT.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.82%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDOT.DE CoinShares Physical Staked Polkadot EUR ETP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF | 4.82% | 6.31% | 1.60% | 1.79% | 0.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CDOT.DE and IBLC have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CDOT.DE is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CDOT.DE is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IBLC.
They also come from different issuers: CoinShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for CDOT.DE and 0.47% for IBLC.
Find the right allocation for CDOT.DE and IBLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer