PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CDLB.TO vs. HAD.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

CDLB.TO vs. HAD.TO

Last updated Jul 17, 2026
Documentation

CDLB.TO (CI DoubleLine Total Return Bond US$ Fund ETF C$ Hedged Series) and HAD.TO (Global X Active Canadian Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CDLB.TO is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by CI Global Asset Management, while HAD.TO is a Total Bond Market fund actively managed by Global X. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, CDLB.TO returned -0.57%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for HAD.TO. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CDLB.TO vs. HAD.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI DoubleLine Total Return Bond US$ Fund ETF C$ Hedged Series (CDLB.TO) and Global X Active Canadian Bond ETF (HAD.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDLB.TO achieves a -0.42% return, which is significantly lower than HAD.TO's 0.97% return.

CDLB.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.43%
6M
-0.42%
YTD
-0.42%
1Y
2.92%
3Y*
3.31%
5Y*
-0.57%
10Y*
—

HAD.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.47%
6M
0.75%
YTD
0.97%
1Y
4.58%
3Y*
4.38%
5Y*
0.24%
10Y*
1.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CDLB.TO vs. HAD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CDLB.TO
CI DoubleLine Total Return Bond US$ Fund ETF C$ Hedged Series		-0.42%5.44%2.91%2.39%-12.02%-0.11%3.68%
HAD.TO
Global X Active Canadian Bond ETF		0.97%3.04%4.29%6.25%-12.17%-4.66%2.95%

Correlation

The correlation between CDLB.TO and HAD.TO is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2020

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

CI DoubleLine Total Return Bond US$ Fund ETF C$ Hedged Series

Global X Active Canadian Bond ETF

Often compared with CDLB.TO:
CDLB.TO vs. WXM.TOCDLB.TO vs. CGHY.TOCDLB.TO vs. CCCX-B.TOCDLB.TO vs. ZXM.TOCDLB.TO vs. CCCX.TOCDLB.TO vs. ETHX.TOCDLB.TO vs. FLI.TO
Often compared with HAD.TO:
HAD.TO vs. CAGG.TOHAD.TO vs. CASH.TOHAD.TO vs. CBIL.TOHAD.TO vs. CHPS.TOHAD.TO vs. DCU.TOHAD.TO vs. DRCU.TOHAD.TO vs. HBB.TO

Return for Risk

CDLB.TO vs. HAD.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CDLB.TO
CDLB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
CDLB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDLB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDLB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
CDLB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDLB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
HAD.TO
HAD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
HAD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
HAD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDLB.TO vs. HAD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI DoubleLine Total Return Bond US$ Fund ETF C$ Hedged Series (CDLB.TO) and Global X Active Canadian Bond ETF (HAD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

CDLB.TOHAD.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.77
0.93

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.15
1.39

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.17

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.39

1.51

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.87

3.98

-1.11

CDLB.TO vs. HAD.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDLB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is comparable to the HAD.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDLB.TO and HAD.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CDLB.TO vs. HAD.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDLB.TO drawdown since its inception was -16.85%, smaller than the maximum HAD.TO drawdown of -22.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDLB.TO and HAD.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

CDLB.TOHAD.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.85%

-22.77%

+5.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.11%

-3.05%

+0.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.32%

-5.95%

+0.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.85%

-17.19%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-22.77%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.30%

-4.38%

+1.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.34%

-5.45%

-0.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.02%

1.15%

-0.13%

Volatility

CDLB.TO vs. HAD.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CI DoubleLine Total Return Bond US$ Fund ETF C$ Hedged Series (CDLB.TO) is 0.69%, while Global X Active Canadian Bond ETF (HAD.TO) has a volatility of 1.45%. This indicates that CDLB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HAD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

CDLB.TOHAD.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.69%

1.45%

-0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.45%

3.60%

-1.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.83%

4.97%

-1.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.36%

7.06%

-1.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.91%

8.90%

-3.99%

Dividends

CDLB.TO vs. HAD.TO - Dividend Comparison

CDLB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, more than HAD.TO's 3.73% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CDLB.TO
CI DoubleLine Total Return Bond US$ Fund ETF C$ Hedged Series		4.54%4.45%4.65%3.87%2.81%2.38%1.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HAD.TO
Global X Active Canadian Bond ETF		3.73%3.46%3.14%3.04%3.12%2.09%2.04%2.29%2.64%2.85%2.96%2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

CDLB.TO and HAD.TO have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CDLB.TO is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while HAD.TO is Total Bond Market. They also come from different issuers: CI Global Asset Management and Global X.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CDLB.TO and HAD.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer