CDIV.TO vs. VUDV.TO
CDIV.TO (Manulife Smart Dividend ETF) and VUDV.TO (Vanguard U.S. High Dividend Yield Index ETF) are both Dividend funds. CDIV.TO is actively managed, while VUDV.TO is passively managed. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.28% expense ratio.
Performance
CDIV.TO vs. VUDV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CDIV.TO
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 3.71%
- YTD
- 14.31%
- 6M
- 10.66%
- 1Y
- 31.29%
- 3Y*
- 20.24%
- 5Y*
- 13.50%
- 10Y*
- —
VUDV.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 4.69%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CDIV.TO vs. VUDV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CDIV.TO Manulife Smart Dividend ETF | 7.61% |
VUDV.TO Vanguard U.S. High Dividend Yield Index ETF | 8.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between CDIV.TO and VUDV.TO is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2026 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CDIV.TO vs. VUDV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CDIV.TO
VUDV.TO
CDIV.TO vs. VUDV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manulife Smart Dividend ETF (CDIV.TO) and Vanguard U.S. High Dividend Yield Index ETF (VUDV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CDIV.TO | VUDV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.20 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.38 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CDIV.TO | VUDV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.40 | 7.57 | -6.17 |
Drawdowns
CDIV.TO vs. VUDV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CDIV.TO drawdown since its inception was -16.44%, which is greater than VUDV.TO's maximum drawdown of -0.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDIV.TO and VUDV.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CDIV.TO | VUDV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.44% | -0.68% | -15.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.48% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | 0.00% | -0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.83% | -0.16% | -2.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.81% | — | — |
Volatility
CDIV.TO vs. VUDV.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CDIV.TO | VUDV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.82% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.70% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.05% | 7.57% | +4.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.05% | 7.57% | +4.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.90% | 7.57% | +4.33% |
CDIV.TO vs. VUDV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CDIV.TO and VUDV.TO have an expense ratio of 0.28%.
Dividends
CDIV.TO vs. VUDV.TO - Dividend Comparison
CDIV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, while VUDV.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDIV.TO Manulife Smart Dividend ETF | 2.28% | 3.02% | 3.41% | 3.45% | 3.41% | 2.38% | 0.07% |
VUDV.TO Vanguard U.S. High Dividend Yield Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CDIV.TO and VUDV.TO have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.28% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CDIV.TO and VUDV.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.28% per year.
They also come from different issuers: Manulife and Vanguard.
Find the right allocation for CDIV.TO and VUDV.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer