CDIV.TO vs. QQC.TO

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

CDIV.TO (Manulife Smart Dividend ETF) and QQC.TO (Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged) are both exchange-traded funds - CDIV.TO is a Dividend fund actively managed by Manulife, while QQC.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. CDIV.TO is actively managed, while QQC.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CDIV.TO returned 12.33%/yr vs 17.98%/yr for QQC.TO. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CDIV.TO charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for QQC.TO.

Performance

CDIV.TO vs. QQC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Manulife Smart Dividend ETF (CDIV.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDIV.TO achieves a 16.68% return, which is significantly lower than QQC.TO's 19.68% return.

CDIV.TO

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: 1.00%
• 6M: 12.70%
• YTD: 16.68%
• 1Y: 23.74%
• 3Y*: 18.68%
• 5Y*: 12.33%
• 10Y*: —

QQC.TO

• 1D: -0.49%
• 1M: -3.03%
• 6M: 17.35%
• YTD: 19.68%
• 1Y: 32.27%
• 3Y*: 26.75%
• 5Y*: 17.98%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CDIV.TO vs. QQC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CDIV.TO Manulife Smart Dividend ETF	16.68%	18.95%	13.96%	11.77%	-2.50%	6.34%
QQC.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged	19.68%	15.38%	35.74%	51.68%	-28.05%	25.39%

Correlation

The correlation between CDIV.TO and QQC.TO is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.33
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2021	0.39

The correlation between CDIV.TO and QQC.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.40 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CDIV.TO vs. QQC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDIV.TO

CDIV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 54
CDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
CDIV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
CDIV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 75
CDIV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
CDIV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 50

QQC.TO

QQC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 66
QQC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
QQC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
QQC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 68
QQC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
QQC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDIV.TO vs. QQC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manulife Smart Dividend ETF (CDIV.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CDIV.TO	QQC.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	1.80	-0.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.74	2.39	-0.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.32	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.16	2.67	-0.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.84	8.18	-1.35

CDIV.TO vs. QQC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the QQC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDIV.TO and QQC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CDIV.TO vs. QQC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDIV.TO drawdown since its inception was -16.44%, smaller than the maximum QQC.TO drawdown of -31.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDIV.TO and QQC.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CDIV.TO	QQC.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.44%	-31.81%	+15.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.05%	-12.14%	+1.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.05%	-22.58%	+11.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.44%	-31.81%	+15.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.10%	-3.83%	+3.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.03%	-7.92%	+4.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.48%	3.95%	-0.47%

Volatility

CDIV.TO vs. QQC.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Manulife Smart Dividend ETF (CDIV.TO) is 3.91%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC.TO) has a volatility of 7.36%. This indicates that CDIV.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CDIV.TO	QQC.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.91%	7.36%	-3.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.80%	14.76%	-4.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.76%	18.03%	-2.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.87%	21.26%	-8.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.58%	21.05%	-8.47%

CDIV.TO vs. QQC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CDIV.TO has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than QQC.TO's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

CDIV.TO vs. QQC.TO - Dividend Comparison

CDIV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, more than QQC.TO's 0.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CDIV.TO Manulife Smart Dividend ETF	2.47%	3.19%	3.45%	3.45%	3.41%	2.38%	0.07%
QQC.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged	0.32%	0.39%	0.45%	0.54%	0.91%	0.56%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CDIV.TO and QQC.TO in my portfolio?

CDIV.TO and QQC.TO have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CDIV.TO or QQC.TO?

On fees, QQC.TO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CDIV.TO or QQC.TO?

QQC.TO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for CDIV.TO.

What is the main difference between CDIV.TO and QQC.TO?

CDIV.TO is categorized as Dividend, while QQC.TO is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Manulife and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for CDIV.TO and 0.20% for QQC.TO.