CDIV.TO vs. PSA.TO

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

CDIV.TO (Manulife Smart Dividend ETF) and PSA.TO (Purpose High Interest Savings Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - CDIV.TO is a Dividend fund actively managed by Manulife, while PSA.TO is a Money Market fund actively managed by Purpose Investments. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, CDIV.TO returned 12.33%/yr vs 3.21%/yr for PSA.TO. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CDIV.TO charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for PSA.TO.

Performance

CDIV.TO vs. PSA.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Manulife Smart Dividend ETF (CDIV.TO) and Purpose High Interest Savings Fund (PSA.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDIV.TO achieves a 16.68% return, which is significantly higher than PSA.TO's 1.15% return.

CDIV.TO

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: 1.00%
• 6M: 12.70%
• YTD: 16.68%
• 1Y: 23.74%
• 3Y*: 18.68%
• 5Y*: 12.33%
• 10Y*: —

PSA.TO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.18%
• 6M: 1.09%
• YTD: 1.15%
• 1Y: 2.31%
• 3Y*: 3.61%
• 5Y*: 3.21%
• 10Y*: 2.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CDIV.TO vs. PSA.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CDIV.TO Manulife Smart Dividend ETF	16.68%	18.95%	13.96%	11.77%	-2.50%	26.20%	1.92%
PSA.TO Purpose High Interest Savings Fund	1.15%	2.64%	4.55%	5.13%	2.32%	0.61%	0.07%

Correlation

The correlation between CDIV.TO and PSA.TO is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.04
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.03
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2020	0.04

Return for Risk

CDIV.TO vs. PSA.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDIV.TO

CDIV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 54
CDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
CDIV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
CDIV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 75
CDIV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
CDIV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 50

PSA.TO

PSA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 99
PSA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
PSA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
PSA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 99
PSA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
PSA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDIV.TO vs. PSA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manulife Smart Dividend ETF (CDIV.TO) and Purpose High Interest Savings Fund (PSA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CDIV.TO	PSA.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	9.41	-7.89
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.74	23.36	-21.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	5.76	-4.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.16	115.87	-113.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.84	353.52	-346.68

CDIV.TO vs. PSA.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is lower than the PSA.TO Sharpe Ratio of 9.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDIV.TO and PSA.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CDIV.TO vs. PSA.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDIV.TO drawdown since its inception was -16.44%, which is greater than PSA.TO's maximum drawdown of -0.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDIV.TO and PSA.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CDIV.TO	PSA.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.44%	-0.04%	-16.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.05%	-0.02%	-11.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.05%	-0.02%	-11.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.44%	-0.04%	-16.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-0.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.10%	0.00%	-0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.03%	-0.00%	-3.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.48%	0.01%	+3.47%

Volatility

CDIV.TO vs. PSA.TO - Volatility Comparison

Manulife Smart Dividend ETF (CDIV.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.91% compared to Purpose High Interest Savings Fund (PSA.TO) at 0.05%. This indicates that CDIV.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSA.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CDIV.TO	PSA.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.91%	0.05%	+3.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.80%	0.16%	+9.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.76%	0.25%	+15.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.87%	0.29%	+12.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.58%	0.25%	+12.33%

CDIV.TO vs. PSA.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CDIV.TO has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than PSA.TO's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

CDIV.TO vs. PSA.TO - Dividend Comparison

CDIV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, more than PSA.TO's 2.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CDIV.TO Manulife Smart Dividend ETF	2.47%	3.19%	3.45%	3.45%	3.41%	2.38%	0.07%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PSA.TO Purpose High Interest Savings Fund	2.30%	2.61%	4.46%	5.05%	2.26%	0.59%	0.94%	2.18%	1.66%	1.07%	0.99%	1.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CDIV.TO and PSA.TO in my portfolio?

CDIV.TO and PSA.TO have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CDIV.TO or PSA.TO?

On fees, PSA.TO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CDIV.TO or PSA.TO?

PSA.TO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for CDIV.TO.

What is the main difference between CDIV.TO and PSA.TO?

CDIV.TO is categorized as Dividend, while PSA.TO is Money Market. They also come from different issuers: Manulife and Purpose Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for CDIV.TO and 0.17% for PSA.TO.