PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CDFF.L vs. TW.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CDFF.L vs. TW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Cardiff Property plc (CDFF.L) and Taylor Wimpey PLC (TW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDFF.L achieves a 2.99% return, which is significantly higher than TW.L's -25.71% return. Over the past 10 years, CDFF.L has outperformed TW.L with an annualized return of 14.49%, while TW.L has yielded a comparatively lower -1.11% annualized return.


CDFF.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.36%
YTD
2.99%
6M
2.99%
1Y
6.95%
3Y*
5.27%
5Y*
24.51%
10Y*
14.49%

TW.L

1D
1.15%
1M
-2.38%
YTD
-25.71%
6M
-21.67%
1Y
-26.79%
3Y*
-6.29%
5Y*
-7.91%
10Y*
-1.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CDFF.L vs. TW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CDFF.L
Cardiff Property plc
2.99%11.25%7.57%-4.13%128.53%20.05%1.01%-1.89%2.94%13.28%
TW.L
Taylor Wimpey PLC
-25.71%-3.91%-11.37%57.04%-36.73%11.45%-4.62%58.59%-28.42%44.27%

Correlation

The correlation between CDFF.L and TW.L is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2000

0.01

Fundamentals

EPS

CDFF.L:

£2.38

TW.L:

£0.09

PE Ratio

CDFF.L:

11.57

TW.L:

8.58

PS Ratio

CDFF.L:

14.03

TW.L:

0.38

Total Revenue (TTM)

CDFF.L:

£2.00M

TW.L:

£7.25B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CDFF.L:

£2.05M

TW.L:

£1.31B

EBITDA (TTM)

CDFF.L:

£1.32M

TW.L:

£854.90M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CDFF.L vs. TW.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDFF.L

TW.L
TW.L Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
TW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
TW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
TW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
TW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDFF.L vs. TW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cardiff Property plc (CDFF.L) and Taylor Wimpey PLC (TW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CDFF.LTW.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.54

CDFF.L vs. TW.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDFF.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is higher than the TW.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDFF.L and TW.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CDFF.LTW.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

-0.98

+2.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

-0.28

+0.86

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

-0.03

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.03

+0.55

Drawdowns

CDFF.L vs. TW.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDFF.L drawdown since its inception was -64.04%, smaller than the maximum TW.L drawdown of -98.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDFF.L and TW.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CDFF.LTW.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.04%

-98.99%

+34.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

0.00%

-32.99%

+32.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.12%

-48.12%

+42.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.02%

-50.58%

+41.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-10.00%

-56.37%

+46.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-47.51%

+47.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.44%

-42.00%

+34.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

17.37%

-17.37%

Volatility

CDFF.L vs. TW.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cardiff Property plc (CDFF.L) is 0.36%, while Taylor Wimpey PLC (TW.L) has a volatility of 8.39%. This indicates that CDFF.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CDFF.LTW.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.36%

8.39%

-8.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.00%

20.75%

-18.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.32%

27.22%

-22.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.05%

28.71%

+13.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.17%

34.65%

-4.48%

Dividends

CDFF.L vs. TW.L - Dividend Comparison

CDFF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than TW.L's 9.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CDFF.L
Cardiff Property plc
1.09%0.91%0.92%0.91%42.34%0.87%1.00%0.97%0.90%0.83%0.88%1.01%
TW.L
Taylor Wimpey PLC
9.87%8.68%7.85%6.51%8.91%4.72%8.92%9.48%11.21%6.68%7.11%4.67%

Financials

CDFF.L vs. TW.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cardiff Property plc and Taylor Wimpey PLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
846.00K
2.19B
(CDFF.L) Total Revenue
(TW.L) Total Revenue
Values in GBp except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CDFF.L and TW.L have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CDFF.L and TW.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer