PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CDDYX vs. LSVVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CDDYX vs. LSVVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class (CDDYX) and LSV Conservative Value Equity Fund (LSVVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDDYX achieves a 12.30% return, which is significantly lower than LSVVX's 21.02% return. Over the past 10 years, CDDYX has outperformed LSVVX with an annualized return of 12.74%, while LSVVX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.26% annualized return.


CDDYX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.73%
6M
7.24%
YTD
12.30%
1Y
22.14%
3Y*
15.50%
5Y*
11.19%
10Y*
12.74%
ALL TIME*
13.11%

LSVVX

1D
0.35%
1M
3.76%
6M
15.85%
YTD
21.02%
1Y
39.58%
3Y*
15.88%
5Y*
11.32%
10Y*
11.26%
ALL TIME*
7.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

CDDYX vs. LSVVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CDDYX
Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class
12.30%15.95%15.17%10.65%-4.84%26.43%7.92%28.74%-4.27%20.34%
LSVVX
LSV Conservative Value Equity Fund
21.02%19.63%3.97%12.19%-4.02%28.57%-3.46%25.29%-11.10%16.18%

Correlation

The correlation between CDDYX and LSVVX is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2012

0.91

The correlation between CDDYX and LSVVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CDDYX vs. LSVVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CDDYX
CDDYX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
CDDYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDDYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDDYX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
CDDYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDDYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

LSVVX
LSVVX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
LSVVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSVVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSVVX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
LSVVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSVVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CDDYX vs. LSVVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class (CDDYX) and LSV Conservative Value Equity Fund (LSVVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CDDYXLSVVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.62

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.91

6.10

-2.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.96

24.16

-9.21

CDDYX vs. LSVVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDDYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is lower than the LSVVX Sharpe Ratio of 3.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDDYX and LSVVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CDDYX vs. LSVVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDDYX drawdown since its inception was -32.74%, smaller than the maximum LSVVX drawdown of -61.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDDYX and LSVVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CDDYXLSVVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.74%

-61.62%

+28.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.51%

-6.23%

+0.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.99%

-24.61%

+11.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.91%

-24.61%

+7.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.74%

-40.61%

+7.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.17%

-0.41%

-0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.74%

-12.10%

+9.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.45%

1.57%

-0.12%

Volatility

CDDYX vs. LSVVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class (CDDYX) is 2.41%, while LSV Conservative Value Equity Fund (LSVVX) has a volatility of 2.67%. This indicates that CDDYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSVVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CDDYXLSVVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.41%

2.67%

-0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.73%

8.14%

-1.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.20%

11.20%

-2.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.22%

15.84%

-2.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.66%

18.42%

-2.76%

CDDYX vs. LSVVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CDDYX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than LSVVX's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

CDDYX vs. LSVVX - Dividend Comparison

CDDYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, less than LSVVX's 11.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CDDYX
Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class
4.79%5.33%5.99%4.96%3.90%2.93%1.85%3.28%7.65%4.03%3.84%8.35%
LSVVX
LSV Conservative Value Equity Fund
11.31%13.69%2.45%6.57%5.41%3.67%2.40%21.48%3.91%1.98%2.37%2.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


CDDYX and LSVVX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LSVVX has higher volatility (2.67%) compared to CDDYX (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDDYX dropped -32.74% vs LSVVX's -61.62%.

LSVVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.40 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CDDYX and LSVVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer