PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CDDYX vs. FALGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CDDYX vs. FALGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class (CDDYX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M (FALGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CDDYX having a 12.63% annualized return and FALGX not far ahead at 13.04%.


CDDYX

1D
0.12%
1M
1.25%
6M
8.59%
YTD
11.40%
1Y
20.15%
3Y*
16.89%
5Y*
11.20%
10Y*
12.63%

FALGX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
1Y
4.93%
3Y*
15.51%
5Y*
10.64%
10Y*
13.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CDDYX vs. FALGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CDDYX
Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class
11.40%15.95%15.17%10.65%-4.84%26.43%7.92%28.74%-4.27%20.34%
FALGX
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M
0.00%19.09%18.68%22.88%-8.40%25.20%8.27%31.01%-8.88%16.83%

Correlation

The correlation between CDDYX and FALGX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2012

0.87

Over the past year, the correlation between CDDYX and FALGX has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CDDYX vs. FALGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDDYX
CDDYX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
CDDYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDDYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDDYX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
CDDYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDDYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

FALGX
FALGX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
FALGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FALGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
FALGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
FALGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
FALGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDDYX vs. FALGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class (CDDYX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M (FALGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CDDYXFALGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.23

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.72

1.17

+2.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.99

1.82

+12.17

CDDYX vs. FALGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDDYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is higher than the FALGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDDYX and FALGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CDDYX vs. FALGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDDYX drawdown since its inception was -32.74%, smaller than the maximum FALGX drawdown of -64.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDDYX and FALGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CDDYXFALGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.74%

-64.07%

+31.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.51%

-5.06%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.99%

-21.78%

+8.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.91%

-21.78%

+4.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.74%

-37.58%

+4.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-4.20%

+4.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.75%

-14.40%

+11.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.46%

3.04%

-1.58%

Volatility

CDDYX vs. FALGX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class (CDDYX) has a higher volatility of 2.60% compared to Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M (FALGX) at 0.00%. This indicates that CDDYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FALGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CDDYXFALGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.60%

0.00%

+2.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.91%

2.37%

+4.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.14%

7.50%

+1.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.25%

16.57%

-3.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.65%

18.53%

-2.88%

CDDYX vs. FALGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CDDYX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than FALGX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

CDDYX vs. FALGX - Dividend Comparison

CDDYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%, less than FALGX's 5.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CDDYX
Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class
4.83%5.33%5.99%4.96%3.90%2.93%1.85%3.28%7.65%4.03%3.84%8.35%
FALGX
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M
5.76%5.76%0.00%3.20%1.91%6.44%5.25%8.39%16.99%6.42%1.85%2.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


CDDYX and FALGX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CDDYX has higher volatility (2.60%) compared to FALGX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDDYX dropped -32.74% vs FALGX's -64.07%.

CDDYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CDDYX and FALGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer