PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CDDRX vs. THPGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CDDRX vs. THPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class R5 (CDDRX) and Thompson LargeCap Fund (THPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDDRX achieves a 8.13% return, which is significantly lower than THPGX's 12.02% return. Over the past 10 years, CDDRX has underperformed THPGX with an annualized return of 12.58%, while THPGX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.89% annualized return.


CDDRX

1D
0.94%
1M
1.48%
YTD
8.13%
6M
8.46%
1Y
20.40%
3Y*
16.65%
5Y*
10.75%
10Y*
12.58%

THPGX

1D
0.31%
1M
4.18%
YTD
12.02%
6M
14.47%
1Y
40.27%
3Y*
22.75%
5Y*
12.38%
10Y*
14.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CDDRX vs. THPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CDDRX
Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class R5
8.13%15.93%15.07%10.61%-4.89%26.32%7.87%28.62%-4.32%20.28%
THPGX
Thompson LargeCap Fund
12.02%27.10%17.14%22.06%-15.78%28.09%15.49%33.59%-12.31%18.24%

Correlation

The correlation between CDDRX and THPGX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2012

0.88

The correlation between CDDRX and THPGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CDDRX vs. THPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDDRX
CDDRX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
CDDRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDDRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDDRX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
CDDRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDDRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

THPGX
THPGX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
THPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
THPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
THPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
THPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDDRX vs. THPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class R5 (CDDRX) and Thompson LargeCap Fund (THPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CDDRXTHPGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.60

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.82

5.04

-1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.40

20.55

-6.16

CDDRX vs. THPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDDRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the THPGX Sharpe Ratio of 3.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDDRX and THPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CDDRXTHPGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

3.31

-0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.70

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.75

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

0.50

+0.37

Drawdowns

CDDRX vs. THPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDDRX drawdown since its inception was -32.80%, smaller than the maximum THPGX drawdown of -65.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDDRX and THPGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CDDRXTHPGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.80%

-65.52%

+32.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.51%

-8.16%

+2.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.00%

-18.75%

+5.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.94%

-26.49%

+9.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.80%

-40.68%

+7.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.30%

0.00%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.78%

-9.58%

+6.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.46%

2.00%

-0.54%

Volatility

CDDRX vs. THPGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class R5 (CDDRX) is 2.49%, while Thompson LargeCap Fund (THPGX) has a volatility of 2.63%. This indicates that CDDRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than THPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CDDRXTHPGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.49%

2.63%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.87%

8.86%

-1.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.07%

12.41%

-3.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.27%

17.75%

-4.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.70%

19.94%

-4.24%

CDDRX vs. THPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CDDRX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than THPGX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

CDDRX vs. THPGX - Dividend Comparison

CDDRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.94%, less than THPGX's 5.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CDDRX
Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class R5
4.94%5.29%5.96%4.92%3.86%2.89%1.78%3.20%7.61%4.01%3.81%8.31%
THPGX
Thompson LargeCap Fund
5.00%5.60%11.97%8.38%5.06%4.95%0.90%2.73%0.89%0.82%0.80%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


CDDRX and THPGX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

THPGX has higher volatility (2.63%) compared to CDDRX (2.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDDRX dropped -32.80% vs THPGX's -65.52%.

THPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.31 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CDDRX and THPGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer