PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CDDRX vs. PRDGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CDDRX vs. PRDGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class R5 (CDDRX) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDDRX achieves a 8.13% return, which is significantly higher than PRDGX's 7.60% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CDDRX having a 12.58% annualized return and PRDGX not far ahead at 12.87%.


CDDRX

1D
0.94%
1M
1.48%
YTD
8.13%
6M
8.46%
1Y
20.40%
3Y*
16.65%
5Y*
10.75%
10Y*
12.58%

PRDGX

1D
0.79%
1M
3.23%
YTD
7.60%
6M
7.74%
1Y
17.14%
3Y*
15.54%
5Y*
10.09%
10Y*
12.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CDDRX vs. PRDGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CDDRX
Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class R5
8.13%15.93%15.07%10.61%-4.89%26.32%7.87%28.62%-4.32%20.28%
PRDGX
T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc.
7.60%14.74%13.48%13.68%-10.22%26.03%13.92%31.76%-1.06%18.89%

Correlation

The correlation between CDDRX and PRDGX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2012

0.96

The correlation between CDDRX and PRDGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CDDRX vs. PRDGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDDRX
CDDRX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
CDDRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDDRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDDRX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
CDDRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDDRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

PRDGX
PRDGX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
PRDGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRDGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRDGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
PRDGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRDGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDDRX vs. PRDGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class R5 (CDDRX) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CDDRXPRDGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.32

1.82

+0.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.33

2.60

+0.74

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.32

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.82

2.41

+1.42

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.40

9.85

+4.55

CDDRX vs. PRDGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDDRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the PRDGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDDRX and PRDGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CDDRXPRDGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

1.82

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.72

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.81

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

0.66

+0.21

Drawdowns

CDDRX vs. PRDGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDDRX drawdown since its inception was -32.80%, smaller than the maximum PRDGX drawdown of -49.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDDRX and PRDGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CDDRXPRDGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.80%

-49.79%

+16.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.51%

-7.34%

+1.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.00%

-14.15%

+1.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.94%

-19.31%

+2.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.80%

-33.18%

+0.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.30%

0.00%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.78%

-5.42%

+2.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.46%

1.79%

-0.33%

Volatility

CDDRX vs. PRDGX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class R5 (CDDRX) has a higher volatility of 2.49% compared to T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX) at 2.33%. This indicates that CDDRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRDGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CDDRXPRDGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.49%

2.33%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.87%

7.56%

-0.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.07%

9.72%

-0.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.27%

14.06%

-0.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.70%

15.88%

-0.18%

CDDRX vs. PRDGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CDDRX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than PRDGX's 0.62% expense ratio.


Dividends

CDDRX vs. PRDGX - Dividend Comparison

CDDRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.94%, less than PRDGX's 7.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CDDRX
Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class R5
4.94%5.29%5.96%4.92%3.86%2.89%1.78%3.20%7.61%4.01%3.81%8.31%
PRDGX
T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc.
7.52%8.02%4.66%2.78%3.81%2.00%1.03%2.33%3.67%1.82%3.07%7.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, CDDRX and PRDGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CDDRX has higher volatility (2.49%) compared to PRDGX (2.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDDRX dropped -32.80% vs PRDGX's -49.79%.

CDDRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CDDRX and PRDGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer