CDCDX vs. MDSIX
CDCDX (The Community Development Fund) and MDSIX (Integrity Short Term Government Fund) are both Government Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, CDCDX returned 0.52%/yr vs 2.15%/yr for MDSIX. Their 0.69 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CDCDX charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for MDSIX.
Performance
CDCDX vs. MDSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CDCDX achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly lower than MDSIX's 1.60% return.
CDCDX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -0.45%
- 6M
- -0.04%
- YTD
- 0.24%
- 1Y
- 2.26%
- 3Y*
- 3.19%
- 5Y*
- 0.52%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.35%
MDSIX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -0.50%
- 6M
- 1.27%
- YTD
- 1.60%
- 1Y
- 4.95%
- 3Y*
- 5.96%
- 5Y*
- 2.15%
- 10Y*
- 1.94%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.61%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
CDCDX vs. MDSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDCDX The Community Development Fund | 0.24% | 4.71% | 2.41% | 3.76% | -6.68% | -1.86% | 4.39% | 5.35% | -0.30% | 1.54% |
MDSIX Integrity Short Term Government Fund | 1.60% | 6.91% | 6.90% | 4.30% | -7.23% | -1.14% | 2.76% | 3.54% | 2.21% | 1.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between CDCDX and MDSIX is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017 | 0.69 |
The correlation between CDCDX and MDSIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CDCDX vs. MDSIX — Risk / Return Rank
CDCDX
MDSIX
CDCDX vs. MDSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Community Development Fund (CDCDX) and Integrity Short Term Government Fund (MDSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CDCDX | MDSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.41 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.06 | 4.07 | -3.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.56 | 15.43 | -12.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CDCDX vs. MDSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CDCDX drawdown since its inception was -10.67%, smaller than the maximum MDSIX drawdown of -11.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDCDX and MDSIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CDCDX | MDSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.67% | -11.28% | +0.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.29% | -1.22% | -1.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.31% | -2.40% | -0.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.25% | -10.98% | +0.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -11.28% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.51% | -0.61% | -0.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.45% | -1.24% | -1.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.91% | 0.32% | +0.59% |
Volatility
CDCDX vs. MDSIX - Volatility Comparison
The Community Development Fund (CDCDX) and Integrity Short Term Government Fund (MDSIX) have volatilities of 0.76% and 0.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CDCDX | MDSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.76% | 0.78% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.24% | 1.95% | +0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.06% | 2.46% | +0.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.62% | 3.37% | +0.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.13% | 3.17% | -0.04% |
CDCDX vs. MDSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CDCDX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than MDSIX's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
CDCDX vs. MDSIX - Dividend Comparison
CDCDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, less than MDSIX's 3.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDCDX The Community Development Fund | 2.27% | 2.12% | 2.73% | 3.36% | 3.19% | 0.96% | 1.46% | 1.86% | 1.90% | 1.94% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MDSIX Integrity Short Term Government Fund | 3.02% | 2.54% | 3.91% | 1.51% | 0.93% | 1.90% | 4.41% | 3.50% | 3.70% | 3.01% | 2.50% | 2.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CDCDX and MDSIX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MDSIX has higher volatility (0.78%) compared to CDCDX (0.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDCDX dropped -10.67% vs MDSIX's -11.28%.
MDSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CDCDX and MDSIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer