CDCDX vs. TQQQ
Compare and contrast key facts about The Community Development Fund (CDCDX) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ).
CDCDX is managed by Community Development Fund. It was launched on Apr 28, 2016. TQQQ is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). It was launched on Feb 9, 2010.
Performance
CDCDX vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CDCDX vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDCDX The Community Development Fund | 0.22% | 4.71% | 2.41% | 3.76% | -6.68% | -1.86% | 4.39% | 5.35% | -0.30% | 1.54% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | -17.87% | 34.35% | 58.27% | 198.04% | -79.09% | 82.98% | 110.05% | 133.84% | -19.79% | 112.91% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CDCDX achieves a 0.22% return, which is significantly higher than TQQQ's -17.87% return.
CDCDX
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -1.53%
- YTD
- 0.22%
- 6M
- 0.72%
- 1Y
- 2.75%
- 3Y*
- 3.08%
- 5Y*
- 0.69%
- 10Y*
- —
TQQQ
- 1D
- 3.72%
- 1M
- -12.88%
- YTD
- -17.87%
- 6M
- -17.28%
- 1Y
- 48.52%
- 3Y*
- 46.87%
- 5Y*
- 13.55%
- 10Y*
- 35.31%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CDCDX vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
CDCDX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CDCDX vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
CDCDX
TQQQ
CDCDX vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Community Development Fund (CDCDX) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CDCDX | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.06 | 0.72 | +0.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.55 | 1.41 | +0.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.20 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.23 | 1.41 | +0.83 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.98 | 4.28 | +1.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CDCDX | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 0.72 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.65 | -0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between CDCDX and TQQQ is 0.00, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CDCDX vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison
CDCDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, more than TQQQ's 0.73% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDCDX The Community Development Fund | 1.93% | 2.12% | 2.73% | 3.36% | 3.19% | 0.96% | 1.46% | 1.86% | 1.90% | 1.94% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 0.73% | 0.65% | 1.27% | 1.26% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
Drawdowns
CDCDX vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CDCDX drawdown since its inception was -10.67%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDCDX and TQQQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CDCDX | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.67% | -81.66% | +70.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.99% | -36.97% | +34.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.36% | -81.66% | +71.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -81.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.53% | -28.08% | +26.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.50% | -18.66% | +16.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.74% | 12.13% | -11.39% |
Volatility
CDCDX vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The Community Development Fund (CDCDX) is 1.20%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 19.74%. This indicates that CDCDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CDCDX | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.20% | 19.74% | -18.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.08% | 38.50% | -36.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.66% | 67.35% | -63.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.55% | 66.53% | -62.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.13% | 65.83% | -62.70% |