CDCDX vs. TQQQ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CDCDX (The Community Development Fund) and TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) are both funds - CDCDX is a Government Bonds fund managed by Community Development Fund, while TQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Over the past 5 years, CDCDX returned 0.55%/yr vs 28.37%/yr for TQQQ. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CDCDX charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TQQQ.

Performance

CDCDX vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Community Development Fund (CDCDX) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDCDX achieves a 0.41% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 64.46% return.

CDCDX

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.29%
• YTD: 0.41%
• 6M: 0.46%
• 1Y: 3.35%
• 3Y*: 3.23%
• 5Y*: 0.55%
• 10Y*: —

TQQQ

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: 33.35%
• YTD: 64.46%
• 6M: 55.93%
• 1Y: 137.89%
• 3Y*: 69.49%
• 5Y*: 28.37%
• 10Y*: 45.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CDCDX vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CDCDX The Community Development Fund	0.41%	4.71%	2.41%	3.76%	-6.68%	-1.86%	4.39%	5.35%	-0.30%	1.54%
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ	64.46%	34.35%	58.27%	198.04%	-79.09%	82.98%	110.05%	133.84%	-19.79%	112.91%

Correlation

The correlation between CDCDX and TQQQ is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.13
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017	0.02

Over the past year, CDCDX and TQQQ have become more correlated (0.24) than their long-term average of 0.02, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

CDCDX vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDCDX

CDCDX Risk / Return Rank: 19
CDCDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
CDCDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
CDCDX Omega Ratio Rank: 19
CDCDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
CDCDX Martin Ratio Rank: 17

TQQQ

TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 71
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 65
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDCDX vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Community Development Fund (CDCDX) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CDCDX	TQQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.22	2.92	-1.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.81	3.09	-1.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.40	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.66	3.75	-2.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.74	12.27	-7.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CDCDX vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDCDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is lower than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDCDX and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CDCDX	TQQQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.22	2.92	-1.70
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16	0.43	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.69	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.74	-0.29

Drawdowns

CDCDX vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDCDX drawdown since its inception was -10.67%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDCDX and TQQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	CDCDX	TQQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.67%	-81.66%	+70.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.29%	-36.97%	+34.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.97%	-58.04%	+54.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.36%	-81.66%	+71.30%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-81.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.35%	-0.76%	-0.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.48%	-18.52%	+16.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.82%	11.28%	-10.46%

Volatility

CDCDX vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Community Development Fund (CDCDX) is 1.10%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 13.29%. This indicates that CDCDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CDCDX	TQQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.10%	13.29%	-12.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.19%	36.04%	-33.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.14%	47.60%	-44.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.59%	66.53%	-62.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.13%	65.96%	-62.83%

CDCDX vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CDCDX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

CDCDX vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

CDCDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, more than TQQQ's 0.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CDCDX The Community Development Fund	2.53%	2.12%	2.73%	3.36%	3.19%	0.96%	1.46%	1.86%	1.90%	1.94%	0.00%	0.00%
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ	0.36%	0.65%	1.27%	1.26%	0.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.06%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CDCDX and TQQQ in my portfolio?

CDCDX and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CDCDX or TQQQ?

TQQQ has higher volatility (13.29%) compared to CDCDX (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDCDX dropped -10.67% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.