PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CDAZX vs. GTAPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CDAZX vs. GTAPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Multi-Manager Directional Alternative Strategies Fund (CDAZX) and Quantitative U.S. Long/Short Equity Portfolio (GTAPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDAZX achieves a 8.13% return, which is significantly lower than GTAPX's 9.18% return.


CDAZX

1D
0.39%
1M
-1.28%
6M
4.47%
YTD
8.13%
1Y
21.94%
3Y*
17.35%
5Y*
11.55%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.06%

GTAPX

1D
-0.57%
1M
4.72%
6M
7.02%
YTD
9.18%
1Y
17.61%
3Y*
11.72%
5Y*
9.82%
10Y*
6.06%
ALL TIME*
3.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

CDAZX vs. GTAPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CDAZX
Multi-Manager Directional Alternative Strategies Fund
8.13%19.20%19.75%3.90%1.31%20.14%-6.39%8.17%-12.03%10.32%
GTAPX
Quantitative U.S. Long/Short Equity Portfolio
9.18%12.79%13.28%4.42%3.16%17.72%-5.16%3.26%-8.65%8.65%

Correlation

The correlation between CDAZX and GTAPX is 0.29, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2017

0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between CDAZX and GTAPX has dropped to 0.29 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CDAZX vs. GTAPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CDAZX
CDAZX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
CDAZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDAZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDAZX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
CDAZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDAZX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

GTAPX
GTAPX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
GTAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
GTAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CDAZX vs. GTAPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Multi-Manager Directional Alternative Strategies Fund (CDAZX) and Quantitative U.S. Long/Short Equity Portfolio (GTAPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CDAZXGTAPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.47

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

6.08

-2.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.61

19.11

-7.50

CDAZX vs. GTAPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDAZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the GTAPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDAZX and GTAPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CDAZX vs. GTAPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDAZX drawdown since its inception was -30.94%, roughly equal to the maximum GTAPX drawdown of -30.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDAZX and GTAPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CDAZXGTAPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.94%

-30.40%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.32%

-3.01%

-4.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.54%

-12.21%

+3.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.91%

-12.21%

+1.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.16%

-0.57%

-1.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.05%

-6.98%

+0.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

0.95%

+1.06%

Volatility

CDAZX vs. GTAPX - Volatility Comparison

Multi-Manager Directional Alternative Strategies Fund (CDAZX) has a higher volatility of 2.77% compared to Quantitative U.S. Long/Short Equity Portfolio (GTAPX) at 2.13%. This indicates that CDAZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GTAPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CDAZXGTAPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.77%

2.13%

+0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.81%

5.36%

+2.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.01%

6.96%

+3.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.20%

10.89%

-1.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.05%

10.25%

-0.20%

CDAZX vs. GTAPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CDAZX has a 1.84% expense ratio, which is higher than GTAPX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

CDAZX vs. GTAPX - Dividend Comparison

CDAZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.52%, more than GTAPX's 15.07% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CDAZX
Multi-Manager Directional Alternative Strategies Fund
21.52%23.28%10.21%1.58%11.48%6.28%0.00%0.79%50.33%3.97%
GTAPX
Quantitative U.S. Long/Short Equity Portfolio
15.07%16.63%11.79%11.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.96%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CDAZX and GTAPX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CDAZX has higher volatility (2.77%) compared to GTAPX (2.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDAZX dropped -30.94% vs GTAPX's -30.40%.

GTAPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CDAZX and GTAPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer